Am 09.06.2015 um 15:49 schrieb Martin Fernau:
Hello! I have two different mails with nearly identical rule hits. On with TO_NO_BRKTS_HTML_ONLY hit and one without. Can one please explain to me why message A gets TO_NO_BRKTS_HTML_ONLY and why message B didn't?
HTML_ONLY means what it says - no plaintext alternate
As you can see, message A gets higher rating because of TO_NO_BRKTS_HTML_ONLY. But for both messages the "To" is identical and both mails only have HTML content
sure that one of them don't have any additional mimepart?
The reason why I ask is because message A is generated by a piece of software from me and sometimes those messages are marked as spam (because they sometimes get DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 and XPRIO with 1.0 points each)
just don't generate priority headers and make sure you use the correct date format with a correct timezone
I try to understand why my "To" is so wrong and if it is 'better' to change the software to always produce To: "martin.fer...@fernausoft.de" <martin.fer...@fernausoft.de> just to get rid of this
To: <martin.fer...@fernausoft.de>
Is it always a better idea to generate the To-Line like this even if I have no real name for the receiver?
the name don't matter, the rule hits NO_BRKTS
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
