Am 29.06.2015 um 01:14 schrieb Charles Sprickman:
If I run sa-learn and ask it to dump some info, that works:
[root@spam-b /usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin]# sa-learn
--username=sp...@bway.net --dump magic
0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version
0.000
This is hopefully easier than I’m thinking it is.
We’ve been running without bayes for a very long time and I thought I’d give
it a shot again with autolearning to see if it’s helpful. The last time I
touched it was 2.6.something and we had spam scanning spread across four
servers and I don’t beli
W dniu 2015-06-28 o 15:57, Axb pisze:
> On 28.06.2015 15:17, Marcin Mirosław wrote:
>> Hi!
>> I've got simple rule with eval:check_uridnsbl to make check against own
>> uribl. And notice that uribl strips subdomains from uri so instead
>> querying for sub4.sub3.sub2.sub1.org.myuribl spamassassin ma
On 28.06.2015 15:17, Marcin Mirosław wrote:
Hi!
I've got simple rule with eval:check_uridnsbl to make check against own
uribl. And notice that uribl strips subdomains from uri so instead
querying for sub4.sub3.sub2.sub1.org.myuribl spamassassin makes query
for sub1.org.myuribl. But I prefer to qu
Hi!
I've got simple rule with eval:check_uridnsbl to make check against own
uribl. And notice that uribl strips subdomains from uri so instead
querying for sub4.sub3.sub2.sub1.org.myuribl spamassassin makes query
for sub1.org.myuribl. But I prefer to query for full domain, without any
striping. Doc
On Friday 26 June 2015 17.40.04 Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
But, putting RBL checks into the MTA is the best way I know to piss off
your users since tag-and-forward is not an option on MTA rbl checking.
That's why we all do our RBL checks in spamassassin.
On 27.06.15 10:18, Martin S wrote:
Could y
