Am 02.08.2015 um 14:57 schrieb Roman Gelfand:
Could somebody post a successful bayes configuration?
??
you just need to *train* it for ham *and* spam
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Could somebody post a successful bayes configuration?
Thanks in advance
On August 2, 2015 6:40:10 PM CEST, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
no idea what you are talking about by saying
I can't find anything about this in the docs
I'm talking about the bundled docs. The man / perldoc pages of
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Bayes /
On August 2, 2015 7:36:36 PM CEST, RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote:
In future start with
man spamassassin
which will lead you to:
CONFIGURATION
Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf SpamAssassin configuration files
I think I've actually seen this page rececntly. I also remember
On August 2, 2015 5:15:08 PM CEST, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 02.08.2015 um 14:57 schrieb Roman Gelfand:
Could somebody post a successful bayes configuration?
??
you just need to *train* it for ham *and* spam
I think I remember from past use of SA that it only uses
On 2 Aug 2015 18:52:38 +0200
Christian Jaeger wrote:
On August 2, 2015 6:40:10 PM CEST, Reindl Harald
h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
no idea what you are talking about by saying
I can't find anything about this in the docs
I'm talking about the bundled docs. The man / perldoc pages of
Am 02.08.2015 um 18:36 schrieb Christian Jaeger:
On August 2, 2015 5:15:08 PM CEST, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 02.08.2015 um 14:57 schrieb Roman Gelfand:
Could somebody post a successful bayes configuration?
??
you just need to *train* it for ham *and* spam
I think
On Sun, 2 Aug 2015, Christian Jaeger wrote:
On August 2, 2015 6:40:10 PM CEST, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
no idea what you are talking about by saying
I can't find anything about this in the docs
I'm talking about the bundled docs. The man / perldoc pages of
On 2 Aug 2015 21:06:40 +0200
Christian Jaeger wrote:
qpsmtpd is different here since it has a plugin architecture and then
it definitely makes more sense to document things in the plugins,
which are just modules. If spamassassin does not have such an
architecture then I agree it makes sense
