Re: why: auto-learn? no: scored as spam but autolearn wanted ham

2015-11-05 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Thursday, November 05, 2015 a las 04:24:04PM +0100, John Wilcock escribió: > Le 05/11/2015 15:54, Matthias Apitz a écrit : > > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on c720-r276659 > > X-Spam-Flag: YES > > X-Spam-Level: ** >

Re: why: auto-learn? no: scored as spam but autolearn wanted ham

2015-11-05 Thread Benny Pedersen
On November 5, 2015 3:54:25 PM Matthias Apitz wrote: ... X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on c720-r276659 X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=1000.0 required=3.0 tests=GTUBE,NO_RECEIVED, NO_RE

Re: New SA install, configuring for retraining on false positives

2015-11-05 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 05.11.2015 um 20:26 schrieb Joe Quinn: On 11/5/2015 1:44 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 05.11.2015 um 19:24 schrieb Bill Cole: On 5 Nov 2015, at 6:52, David Mehler wrote: or SA as a milter called directly from my MTA. There is no such thing: SA is not a milter tell that our spamass-milt

Re: New SA install, configuring for retraining on false positives

2015-11-05 Thread Joe Quinn
On 11/5/2015 1:44 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 05.11.2015 um 19:24 schrieb Bill Cole: On 5 Nov 2015, at 6:52, David Mehler wrote: or SA as a milter called directly from my MTA. There is no such thing: SA is not a milter tell that our spamass-milter setup running for more than a year now r

Re: New SA install, configuring for retraining on false positives

2015-11-05 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 05.11.2015 um 19:24 schrieb Bill Cole: On 5 Nov 2015, at 6:52, David Mehler wrote: or SA as a milter called directly from my MTA. There is no such thing: SA is not a milter tell that our spamass-milter setup running for more than a year now rejecting 99% of junk at MTA level (the piece

Re: New SA install, configuring for retraining on false positives

2015-11-05 Thread Bill Cole
On 5 Nov 2015, at 6:52, David Mehler wrote: Hello, I've got a Postfix email server going with a Mysql database backend on FreeBSD 10.2. I'm now wanting to add Spamassassin to the picture and am wondering current best practices? It's been a number of years since I did it and last time effectiven

Re: why: auto-learn? no: scored as spam but autolearn wanted ham

2015-11-05 Thread Kris Deugau
Matthias Apitz wrote: > This is with version 3.4.0 on FreeBSD 11-CURRENT. If I run with the > sample file: > > $ spamassassin -tD < Mail-SpamAssassin-3.4.0/sample-spam.txt > Why auto-learn wants the mail as HAM? > it says on STDERR: > ... > nov 5 15:47:54.521 [3855] dbg: learn: auto-learn: curr

Re: why: auto-learn? no: scored as spam but autolearn wanted ham

2015-11-05 Thread John Wilcock
Le 05/11/2015 15:54, Matthias Apitz a écrit : X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on c720-r276659 X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=1000.0 required=3.0 tests=GTUBE,NO_RECEIVED, NO_RELAYS autolea

Re: why: auto-learn? no: scored as spam but autolearn wanted ham

2015-11-05 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Thursday, November 05, 2015 a las 03:57:01PM +0100, Reindl Harald escribió: > * 1000 GTUBE BODY: Generic Test for Unsolicited Bulk Email > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GTUBE Maybe because you are top posting you have not read my question, at lease you have not answered it. > nov 5 15:4

why: auto-learn? no: scored as spam but autolearn wanted ham

2015-11-05 Thread Matthias Apitz
Hello, This is with version 3.4.0 on FreeBSD 11-CURRENT. If I run with the sample file: $ spamassassin -tD < Mail-SpamAssassin-3.4.0/sample-spam.txt it says on STDERR: ... nov 5 15:47:54.521 [3855] dbg: learn: auto-learn: currently using scoreset 1 nov 5 15:47:54.521 [3855] dbg: learn: auto-l

Re: why: auto-learn? no: scored as spam but autolearn wanted ham

2015-11-05 Thread Reindl Harald
* 1000 GTUBE BODY: Generic Test for Unsolicited Bulk Email https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GTUBE Am 05.11.2015 um 15:54 schrieb Matthias Apitz: This is with version 3.4.0 on FreeBSD 11-CURRENT. If I run with the sample file: $ spamassassin -tD < Mail-SpamAssassin-3.4.0/sample-spam.txt it says on

Re: New SA install, configuring for retraining on false positives

2015-11-05 Thread David Jones
>From: David Mehler >Sent: Thursday, November 5, 2015 5:52 AM >To: users@spamassassin.apache.org >Subject: New SA install, configuring for retraining on false positives >Hello, >I've got a Postfix email server going with a Mysql database backend on >FreeBSD 10.2. I'm now wanting to add Spamassas

Re: New SA install, configuring for retraining on false positives

2015-11-05 Thread Axb
On 11/05/2015 12:52 PM, David Mehler wrote: It's looking like I have several options, MailScanner which hooks in to SA, Amavisd-new ditto, or SA as a milter called directly from my MTA. Comments on these or other methods? Mailscanner and Postfix is a hack - it works BUT Amavisd-new is good and

Re: New SA install, configuring for retraining on false positives

2015-11-05 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 05.11.2015 um 12:52 schrieb David Mehler: Finally, one of the things I'm going to implement in addition to SA is Sieve, done with my MDA Dovecot, in which mail flagged witha spam header is automatically moved in to a dedicated spam folder. I am then wanting to set up a system to tell SA when

New SA install, configuring for retraining on false positives

2015-11-05 Thread David Mehler
Hello, I've got a Postfix email server going with a Mysql database backend on FreeBSD 10.2. I'm now wanting to add Spamassassin to the picture and am wondering current best practices? It's been a number of years since I did it and last time effectiveness wasn't so good. I'm not sure if it was beca