Re: More on T_SPF_PERMERROR

2015-12-15 Thread Bill Cole
On 14 Dec 2015, at 21:42, Alex wrote: [...] I also don't think it's a DNS problem here, as it doesn't happen on every message. There are also no other indications of problems with DNS. SPF records tend to push the limits of normal DNS, especially in record size, and can bring out edge case

Re: More on T_SPF_PERMERROR

2015-12-15 Thread Martin Gregorie
On Mon, 2015-12-14 at 21:42 -0500, Alex wrote: > Many times the domain actually has something wrong with SPF, but > other times openspf.org/why and kittermans say there's nothing wrong > with the domain. > > Other domains that fail, such as gmail.com and wellsfargo.com, report > softfail on

Re: feed spamassassin with a catch-all address

2015-12-15 Thread Axb
On 12/15/2015 11:33 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: On 12/15/2015 5:25 PM, Juerg Reimann wrote: I have a domain which gets a lot of spam to non-existent addresses. I thought why not set that domain to catch-all and feed all non-existent addresses directly to spamassassin. Any thoughts why this

Re: Trying Bayes / Redis

2015-12-15 Thread Marc Perkel
This Bayes Redis works GREAT. For years I've been trying to get bayes to work and now finally IT WORKS -- Marc Perkel - Sales/Support supp...@junkemailfilter.com http://www.junkemailfilter.com Junk Email Filter dot com 415-992-3400

feed spamassassin with a catch-all address

2015-12-15 Thread Juerg Reimann
I have a domain which gets a lot of spam to non-existent addresses. I thought why not set that domain to catch-all and feed all non-existent addresses directly to spamassassin. Any thoughts why this could be a bad idea? Of course any typos from real senders would also end up in sa, however, I

Re: feed spamassassin with a catch-all address

2015-12-15 Thread Martin Gregorie
On Tue, 2015-12-15 at 23:25 +0100, Juerg Reimann wrote: > I have a domain which gets a lot of spam to non-existent addresses. I > thought why not set that domain to catch-all and feed all non > -existent > addresses directly to spamassassin. Any thoughts why this could be a > bad > idea? Of course

Re: feed spamassassin with a catch-all address

2015-12-15 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 12/15/2015 5:25 PM, Juerg Reimann wrote: I have a domain which gets a lot of spam to non-existent addresses. I thought why not set that domain to catch-all and feed all non-existent addresses directly to spamassassin. Any thoughts why this could be a bad idea? Of course any typos from real

A Plan to Stop Violence on Social Media

2015-12-15 Thread Wrolf
Stop me if you've heard this one. Would it be practical to use the Spamassassin techniques of Bayesian filtering and RBL lists to block ISIS on social media? Wrolf wr...@wrolf.net

Re: A Plan to Stop Violence on Social Media

2015-12-15 Thread Marc Perkel
Probably yes. But talk about opening a can of worms. If you can detect ISIS you can detect anything. On 12/15/15 20:19, Wrolf wrote: Stop me if you've heard this one. Would it be practical to use the Spamassassin techniques of Bayesian filtering and RBL lists to block ISIS on social media?

Re: More on T_SPF_PERMERROR

2015-12-15 Thread Joe Quinn
On 12/15/2015 7:19 AM, Martin Gregorie wrote: On Mon, 2015-12-14 at 21:42 -0500, Alex wrote: Many times the domain actually has something wrong with SPF, but other times openspf.org/why and kittermans say there's nothing wrong with the domain. Other domains that fail, such as gmail.com and

Re: Trying Bayes / Redis

2015-12-15 Thread Axb
On 12/15/2015 10:57 PM, Marc Perkel wrote: This Bayes Redis works GREAT. For years I've been trying to get bayes to work and now finally IT WORKS good news for once... just watch memory usage... :)

Re: A Plan to Stop Violence on Social Media

2015-12-15 Thread Rob McEwen
On 12/15/2015 11:19 PM, Wrolf wrote: Would it be practical to use the Spamassassin techniques of Bayesian filtering and RBL lists to block ISIS on social media? Bayes would have a high potential for false positives... such as blocking a news story about ISIS, or blocking a discussion about