On Tue, 2015-12-15 at 23:25 +0100, Juerg Reimann wrote: > I have a domain which gets a lot of spam to non-existent addresses. I > thought why not set that domain to catch-all and feed all non > -existent > addresses directly to spamassassin. Any thoughts why this could be a > bad > idea? Of course any typos from real senders would also end up in sa, > however, I believe that's in this case negligible... > That's exactly what I do.
However, I also have: - an ISP that runs grey-listing that I have enabled - a private SA rule that adds points for unknown user names - a quarantine system that holds spam for 7 days before deleting it and that lists quarantined messages and stats as part of the daily logwatch report. ... so the very small amount of misclassified spam isn't lost. Martin
