[OT] still configuring [Was: Disabling spamcop plugin]

On 2016-04-12 10:57 -0400, David Niklas wrote: > You could use Gentoo, you get to configure it all yourself! Funny you'd say that, I _am_ actually switching to it - on my "workstation" role computers. I'm already over 50% over the hump, I think. But on "server type" computers, I just cannot

Re: Disabling spamcop plugin

Am 07.04.2016 um 22:55 schrieb Ian Zimmerman: > My high-level goal here is to get rid of as many configuration changes > as I can in the system-managed area (/etc in my case) and achieve the > same effects by other means. This is because I'm learning that I > cannot trust my distro not to screw

Re: How does SpamAssassin processing languages other than English

On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 17:00:21 -0400 Yu Qian wrote: > That's nice to hear SpamAssassin can looks at word pairs, Sorry, maybe I wasn't clear... I was talking about our own Bayes engine. AFAIK, the SpamAssassin Bayes engine only looks at single words. Regards, Dianne.

Re: How does SpamAssassin processing languages other than English

That's nice to hear SpamAssassin can looks at word pairs, As I am new to SpamAssassin, so still trying to find out more interesting things of it. According to the word pairs stuff, does SpamAssassin can detect word like this: if a single word is splitted by space, like Free appeared in a email as

Re: How does SpamAssassin processing languages other than English

On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 13:41:51 -0400 Yu Qian wrote: > Yup, that's right, it becomes difficult if we want to support multiple > language in one spam detection solution. and it's true that there are > some best practice for single language. but didn't see too much >

Re: How does SpamAssassin processing languages other than English

Yup, that's right, it becomes difficult if we want to support multiple language in one spam detection solution. and it's true that there are some best practice for single language. but didn't see too much support multiple --- Yu Qian Ottawa Ontario Phone: (514)-553-0198 On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at

Re: How does SpamAssassin processing languages other than English

On 4/12/2016 1:16 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 12.04.2016 um 18:44 schrieb Yu Qian: SpamAssassin used Bayes as classier, this is typical and efficient for English. But how does it processing languages like Asian language? Can anyone introduce that or anyone can show the code where

Re: How does SpamAssassin processing languages other than English

Am 12.04.2016 um 18:44 schrieb Yu Qian: SpamAssassin used Bayes as classier, this is typical and efficient for English. But how does it processing languages like Asian language? Can anyone introduce that or anyone can show the code where SpamAssassin do that? bayes is by definition language

How does SpamAssassin processing languages other than English

SpamAssassin used Bayes as classier, this is typical and efficient for English. But how does it processing languages like Asian language? Can anyone introduce that or anyone can show the code where SpamAssassin do that? Thanks, guys!

Re: XPRIO - Can you help me?

Am 12.04.2016 um 17:47 schrieb Richard Mealing: -Original Message- From: Reindl Harald [mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net] Sent: 12 April 2016 16:15 To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: XPRIO - Can you help me? Am 12.04.2016 um 16:40 schrieb John Hardin: On Tue, 12 Apr 2016,

Re: Fixing ALL_TRUSTED=-1

Helmut Schneider wrote: > Bill Cole wrote: > > > On 12 Apr 2016, at 9:03, Helmut Schneider wrote: > > > > > Bill Cole wrote: > > > > > > > Pipe that message into "spamassassin -t -D > > > > dns,received-header,metadata" *running as the same user that > > > > runs your Amavisd* and examine the

RE: XPRIO - Can you help me?

-Original Message- From: Reindl Harald [mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net] Sent: 12 April 2016 16:15 To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: XPRIO - Can you help me? Am 12.04.2016 um 16:40 schrieb John Hardin: > On Tue, 12 Apr 2016, Richard Mealing wrote: > >> I have come across a

Re: Fixing ALL_TRUSTED=-1

Bill Cole wrote: > On 12 Apr 2016, at 9:03, Helmut Schneider wrote: > > > Bill Cole wrote: > > > > > Pipe that message into "spamassassin -t -D > > > dns,received-header,metadata" *running as the same user that runs > > > your Amavisd* and examine the first ~20 line of the debug output, > > >

Re: XPRIO - Can you help me?

Am 12.04.2016 um 16:40 schrieb John Hardin: On Tue, 12 Apr 2016, Richard Mealing wrote: I have come across a strange issue where I need some guidance to debug. I just can't understand why one of the servers will not fire on my XPRIO rule. Both the headers have the same information pretty

Re: XPRIO - Can you help me?

On Tue, 12 Apr 2016, Richard Mealing wrote: I have come across a strange issue where I need some guidance to debug. I just can't understand why one of the servers will not fire on my XPRIO rule. Both the headers have the same information pretty much. I've checked the spamassassin debug and

Re: XPRIO - Can you help me?

Am 12.04.2016 um 16:23 schrieb Richard Mealing: I just can’t understand why one of the servers will not fire on my XPRIO rule. Both the headers have the same information pretty much look at /var/lib/spamassassin/3.004001/updates_spamassassin_org/72_active.cf XPRIO is by far not just a

XPRIO - Can you help me?

Hi everyone, I have come across a strange issue where I need some guidance to debug. I have 2 servers and when an email filters through 1 of them, I get this back - (not cached, score=5.403,required 4, BAYES_50 0.80, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28 1.40, HTML_MESSAGE 0.30, HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG 0.38,

Re: Fixing ALL_TRUSTED=-1

Am 12.04.2016 um 15:03 schrieb Helmut Schneider: Amavisd runs chrooted, how can I debug SA while running from amavisd? why are you running it chrooted? you know how easy it is to miss important things in the jail or fail them to update properly - especially in a complex setup? just make

Re: Fixing ALL_TRUSTED=-1

On 12 Apr 2016, at 9:03, Helmut Schneider wrote: Bill Cole wrote: On 11 Apr 2016, at 10:55, Helmut Schneider wrote: Hi, for more than 6 months I'm trying to fix ALL_TRUSTED=-1 without success. Did it just start showing up 6 months ago on a previously-working SpamAssassin installation, of

Re: Fixing ALL_TRUSTED=-1

Bill Cole wrote: > On 11 Apr 2016, at 10:55, Helmut Schneider wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > for more than 6 months I'm trying to fix ALL_TRUSTED=-1 without > > success. > > Did it just start showing up 6 months ago on a previously-working > SpamAssassin installation, of was SA just set up 6 months