On 21 Jun 2016, at 11:21, Alex wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 4:04 AM, Merijn van den Kroonenberg
wrote:
Hi,
We've been having a problem with phishing attacks by spoofing the
MAILFROM and From address. [snip]
The message passes DKIM:
-0.1 DKIM_VALID
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 4:04 AM, Merijn van den Kroonenberg
wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We've been having a problem with phishing attacks by spoofing the
>> MAILFROM and From address. [snip]
>
>> The message passes DKIM:
>>
>> -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one
On 06/21/16 00:03, Alessio Cecchi wrote:
Il 20/06/2016 16:22, Reindl Harald ha scritto:
since Marc is present on this list and maybe others using it too:
dig A c134389d7cefd3aadce78714669239f2.ixhash.junkemailfilter.com.
status: SERVFAIL
Query time: 1798 msec
so at least for the last 2 days
Am 21.06.2016 um 09:03 schrieb Alessio Cecchi:
Il 20/06/2016 16:22, Reindl Harald ha scritto:
since Marc is present on this list and maybe others using it too:
dig A c134389d7cefd3aadce78714669239f2.ixhash.junkemailfilter.com.
status: SERVFAIL
Query time: 1798 msec
so at least for the last
> Hi,
>
> We've been having a problem with phishing attacks by spoofing the
> MAILFROM and From address. [snip]
> The message passes DKIM:
>
> -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK
> signature
> 0.1 DKIM_SIGNEDMessage has a DKIM or DK signature, not
>
Il 20/06/2016 16:22, Reindl Harald ha scritto:
since Marc is present on this list and maybe others using it too:
dig A c134389d7cefd3aadce78714669239f2.ixhash.junkemailfilter.com.
status: SERVFAIL
Query time: 1798 msec
so at least for the last 2 days the rule below slows down scanning
score