Re: Stuff slipping through STYLE_GIBBERISH filter!

On Wed, 7 Sep 2016, Lindsay Haisley wrote: I'm getting a _lot_ of spam slipping through the STYLE_GIBBERISH filter, probably more than is getting caught (although some of it _is_ getting caught). An example body is Any help on this? I'll take a look, but as STYLE_GIBBERISH is intended to be

Stuff slipping through STYLE_GIBBERISH filter!

I'm getting a _lot_ of spam slipping through the STYLE_GIBBERISH filter, probably more than is getting caught (although some of it _is_ getting caught). An example body is

Re: I have some bad news

On 6 Sep 2016, at 16:04, do...@mail.com wrote: On Mon, 05 Sep 2016 20:17:18 "Bill Cole" wrote: On 4 Sep 2016, at 21:11, @lbutlr wrote: On Sep 1, 2016, at 7:41 PM, David Niklas > [do...@mail.com]() wrote: Would you like to go out to lunch? Other than your message,

Re: postfix reject_unverified_recipient and Exchange 2016

On 9/7/2016 3:42 AM, Nicola Piazzi wrote: > > > > I have a problem using reject_unverified_recipient to verify under > Exchange 2016 that I don’t have with Exchange 2010 > This is the wrong list for this question. Please ask this on the postfix-users list for a solution.

Re: postfix reject_unverified_recipient and Exchange 2016

Am 07.09.2016 um 11:00 schrieb Nicola Piazzi: I am off topic if you think that postfix is not spamassassin I think that this is not a Microsoft problem because exchange answer correctly to unknown recipients I suppose that there is something in the return string that postix doesn’t like

Re: R: R: postfix reject_unverified_recipient and Exchange 2016

On Wednesday 07 September 2016 at 11:00:57, Nicola Piazzi wrote: > I am off topici f you think that postfix is not spamassassin Postfix is not spamassassin. Antony. -- The Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals was formed in 1824. The National Society for the Prevention of

R: R: postfix reject_unverified_recipient and Exchange 2016

I am off topici f you think that postfix is not spamassassin I think that this is not a Microsoft problem because exchange answer correctly to unknown recipients I suppose that there is something in the return string that postix doesn’t like Nicola Piazzi CED - Sistemi COMET s.p.a. Via

Re: R: postfix reject_unverified_recipient and Exchange 2016

This is totally off topic. You are on the wrong list for these questions. Use the MS knowledge base. On 09/07/2016 10:56 AM, Nicola Piazzi wrote: It seems NOT a Microsoft problem because with "Recipient Filter Agent" exchange answer "550 5.1.10 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipientNotFound; Recipient not

R: postfix reject_unverified_recipient and Exchange 2016

It seems NOT a Microsoft problem because with "Recipient Filter Agent" exchange answer "550 5.1.10 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipientNotFound; Recipient not found by SMTP address lookup" when a recipient is not found So I don't know why when postfix get "550 5.1.10 RESOLVER.ADR.RecipientNotFound; Recipient

Re: postfix reject_unverified_recipient and Exchange 2016

Am 07.09.2016 um 10:42 schrieb Nicola Piazzi: I have a problem using reject_unverified_recipient to verify under Exchange 2016 that I don’t have with Exchange 2010 how is that a spamassassin or even postfix related problem? call the microsoft support why their stuff is playing backscatter

postfix reject_unverified_recipient and Exchange 2016

I have a problem using reject_unverified_recipient to verify under Exchange 2016 that I don't have with Exchange 2010 Postfix is used to send and receive mail and is between the internet and the internal Exchange Server Now, when an internet user send an email to our domain postfix verify it

Re: new Mail-SpamAssassin-Plugin-AttachmentPresent

>> [snip] >> body HAS_VBS_FILES eval:attachmentpresent_file_count('vbs') >> describe HAS_VBS_FILES The e-mail has attached vbs files (or inside >> archives) >> score HAS_VBS_FILES 2.5 > > This looks very interesting. The scores you've specified seem to be > quite high, however. I'd probably make