Re: FROM header with two email addresses

2017-10-16 Thread Mark London
Hi - I received a spam message with the following double From address: From: struth...@psfc.mit.edu, "Lorraine M." But neither of the 2 previously suggested rules were triggered by it. I'm sure a simple modification to the rules will cause it to trigger. Can

Re: MSBL Email Blocklist (EBL) SA usage query

2017-10-16 Thread John Hardin
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, Merijn van den Kroonenberg wrote: On 10/16/2017 10:04 AM, John Hardin wrote: On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, David Jones wrote: I guess this means I am getting more pressure to fix the nightly masscheck process that has been holding up any rule updates or new versions of SA code. I

Re: MSBL Email Blocklist (EBL) SA usage query

2017-10-16 Thread John Hardin
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, David Jones wrote: On 10/16/2017 10:04 AM, John Hardin wrote: On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, David Jones wrote: > I guess this means I am getting more pressure to fix the nightly > masscheck process that has been holding up any rule updates or new > versions of SA code. I

Re: MSBL Email Blocklist (EBL) SA usage query

2017-10-16 Thread Merijn van den Kroonenberg
> On 10/16/2017 10:04 AM, John Hardin wrote: >> On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, David Jones wrote: >> >>> I guess this means I am getting more pressure to fix the nightly >>> masscheck process that has been holding up any rule updates or new >>> versions of SA code. I have been thinking about a "band-aid"

Re: MSBL Email Blocklist (EBL) SA usage query

2017-10-16 Thread David Jones
On 10/16/2017 10:04 AM, John Hardin wrote: On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, David Jones wrote: I guess this means I am getting more pressure to fix the nightly masscheck process that has been holding up any rule updates or new versions of SA code. I have been thinking about a "band-aid" option to put

Re: MSBL Email Blocklist (EBL) SA usage query

2017-10-16 Thread John Hardin
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, David Jones wrote: I guess this means I am getting more pressure to fix the nightly masscheck process that has been holding up any rule updates or new versions of SA code. I have been thinking about a "band-aid" option to put the missing scores in 72_scores.cf into the

Re: MSBL Email Blocklist (EBL) SA usage query

2017-10-16 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 10/16/2017 8:57 AM, David Jones wrote: I guess this means I am getting more pressure to fix the nightly masscheck process that has been holding up any rule updates or new versions of SA code.  I have been thinking about a "band-aid" option to put the missing scores in 72_scores.cf into

Re: MSBL Email Blocklist (EBL) SA usage query

2017-10-16 Thread David Jones
On 10/15/2017 04:19 PM, Michael Grant wrote: Hi Keven I will tell you in the many months we’ve been using the EBL SA Plug in, we have yet to see a FP, and thus have raised its initial SA scoring of 1 up to 5 and then again presently to 9.  The EBL has been wildly successful for us at

Re: MSBL Email Blocklist (EBL) SA usage query

2017-10-16 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 10/15/2017 5:19 PM, Michael Grant wrote: I will tell you in the many months we’ve been using the EBL SA Plug in, we have yet to see a FP, and thus have raised its initial SA scoring of 1 up to 5 and then again presently to 9.  The EBL has been wildly successful for us at catching and now