On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, Merijn van den Kroonenberg wrote:
On 10/16/2017 10:04 AM, John Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017, David Jones wrote:
I guess this means I am getting more pressure to fix the nightly
masscheck process that has been holding up any rule updates or new
versions of SA code. I have been thinking about a "band-aid" option to
put the missing scores in 72_scores.cf into the static 50_scores.cf
file to keep normal SA scoring levels until the real bug can be found
and fixed.
I'd prefer a separate file so that we can just delete it when the
problem is understood and fixed.
Good idea. Have a recommendation/preference for the new file name?
72_scores_addendum.cf? 72_scores_fix.cf? 73_scores.cf?
I think the new file name should 'sort' before the generated 72_scores.cf?
So the generated 72_scores.cf will override the temporary defaults in the
new file?
The problem is 72_scores has explicit bad scores in it.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liberals love sex ed because it teaches kids to be safe around their
sex organs. Conservatives love gun education because it teaches kids
to be safe around guns. However, both believe that the other's
education goals lead to dangers too terrible to contemplate.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
200 days since the first commercial re-flight of an orbital booster (SpaceX)
