On 01/10/2018 12:40 PM, Alex wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 12:21 PM, Kevin A. McGrail
wrote:
On 1/10/2018 11:23 AM, David Jones wrote:
I need to see the debug verbose output of one that fails to troubleshoot
further.
Agreed. We need someone to run with -D and log it and IDEALLY run
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 12:21 PM, Kevin A. McGrail
wrote:
> On 1/10/2018 11:23 AM, David Jones wrote:
>>
>> I need to see the debug verbose output of one that fails to troubleshoot
>> further.
>
>
> Agreed. We need someone to run with -D and log it and IDEALLY run a few
> right after to see
On 1/10/2018 11:23 AM, David Jones wrote:
I need to see the debug verbose output of one that fails to
troubleshoot further.
Agreed. We need someone to run with -D and log it and IDEALLY run a few
right after to see if it resolves. I'm guessing one mirror is blocking
or something.
Regard
On Wed, 2018-01-10 at 15:23 +, RW wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 15:10:52 +
> Martin Gregorie wrote:
>
>
> > The update defaults to being run from /etc/cron.weekly/sa-update,
> > which runs /usr/bin/sa-update without any other parameters and does
> > nothing else except for decoding the exi
Hi,
> Update: If the downloads are successful but the GPG verification is
> failing, then this would not be a routing issue.
>
> The rsync'ing by the mirrors should happen quickly and the .sha1 and .asc
> files should sync quickly since they are very small files. If the downloads
> are successfu
On 01/10/2018 10:08 AM, David Jones wrote:
On 01/10/2018 09:23 AM, RW wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 15:10:52 +
Martin Gregorie wrote:
The update defaults to being run from /etc/cron.weekly/sa-update,
which runs /usr/bin/sa-update without any other parameters and does
nothing else except for
On 01/10/2018 09:23 AM, RW wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 15:10:52 +
Martin Gregorie wrote:
The update defaults to being run from /etc/cron.weekly/sa-update,
which runs /usr/bin/sa-update without any other parameters and does
nothing else except for decoding the exit code and mailing all outpu
Kevin A. McGrail schrieb am 10.01.2018 um 15:09:
>
> Anyone having issues with Sha1 failures on their machines on sa-updates?
>
> Anyone familiar with sa-update.cron so we can try and get more data
on this bug below?
I'm using sa-update.cron from CentoOS 7. Here it failed once on
09-Jan-2018 0
On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 15:10:52 +
Martin Gregorie wrote:
> The update defaults to being run from /etc/cron.weekly/sa-update,
> which runs /usr/bin/sa-update without any other parameters and does
> nothing else except for decoding the exit code and mailing all output
> to root: I think its the st
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 03:10:52PM +, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-01-10 at 09:09 -0500, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> > Anyone having issues with Sha1 failures on their machines on sa-
> > updates?
> >
> No problems are being reported. The log just shows a single 'Update
> completed' lin
On Wed, 2018-01-10 at 09:09 -0500, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> Anyone having issues with Sha1 failures on their machines on sa-
> updates?
>
No problems are being reported. The log just shows a single 'Update
completed' line for each weekly update.
> Anyone familiar with sa-update.cron so we can tr
On 01/10/2018 08:09 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Anyone having issues with Sha1 failures on their machines on sa-updates?
Anyone familiar with sa-update.cron so we can try and get more data on
this bug below?
Generically, cron is going to email the output of the command so adjust
the sa-upd
David Jones skrev den 2018-01-10 15:37:
actually being forwarded externally back out to the Internet.
Filtered being delivered internally does not need SRS.
fail in spf can be solved to not need srs at all, he imho use srs custom
plugin in amavisd, so not spamassassin error, so to solve that
On 01/10/2018 07:57 AM, Kacper Guzik wrote:
here is complete log:
https://pastebin.com/szVnTXXA
Yep. You need to setup your mail flow where the SRS is done on clean
mail after SA has scored it. Disable SRS in your Postfix config, setup
a second instance of Postfix with SRS enabled for
Kacper Guzik skrev den 2018-01-10 14:57:
https://pastebin.com/szVnTXXA
not spamassassin, so not usefull to get help
test with same msg with "spamassassin -t msg" and show output on
pastebin
https://dmarcian.com/spf-survey/
type mail3.zenbox.pl into into Survey Domain:
it shows some real
here is complete log:
https://pastebin.com/szVnTXXA
srs rewrite e-mail fisher006 at gmail.com to SRS format
Jan 10 09:29:43 mail3 amavis[14933]: (14933-03-2) SA dbg: FreeMail: all
from-addresses: fisher...@gmail.com, srs0=2eq9=ef=gmail.com=fisher0
0...@mail3.zenbox.pl
and spamassassin check'
Anyone having issues with Sha1 failures on their machines on sa-updates?
Anyone familiar with sa-update.cron so we can try and get more data on
this bug below?
Forwarded Message
Subject:[Bug 7331] channel: SHA1 verification failed, channel failed
Date: Tue, 09 Jan
Kacper Guzik skrev den 2018-01-10 14:40:
I change real domain name to fake ;)
why do you ask maillists then ?
This case is related to David Jones.
All emails is rewrited and spamassassin can't check spf record. I
wondering maybe some feature exist to resolve this problem.
you already know y
On 10.01.18 11:45, Kacper Guzik wrote:
Hello, when I'm using postsrsd with spamassassin SPF checks all e-mail have
SPF_FAIL=0.001
I'm trying with use_newest_received_spf_header 1 but this same issue
spamassassin have problem with reconize SPF for mail's with SRS headers
Jan 10 09:15:24 mail3 a
Kacper Guzik skrev den 2018-01-10 11:45:
Jan 10 09:15:24 mail3 amavis[5068]: (05068-01-3) SA dbg: spf: checking
EnvelopeFrom (helo=mx45-71.futurehost.pl [1], ip=91.244.71.45,
envfrom=srs0=pqle=ef=networkmasters.pl
[2]=piotr.rosciszew...@mail3.pl)
mail3.pl have no spf
sorry cant help srs faili
On 01/10/2018 04:45 AM, Kacper Guzik wrote:
Hello, when I'm using postsrsd with spamassassin SPF checks all e-mail
have SPF_FAIL=0.001
I'm trying with use_newest_received_spf_header 1 but this same issue
spamassassin have problem with reconize SPF for mail's with SRS headers
Jan 10 09:15:24 m
hello i have problem like this:
https://pastebin.com/L6F9HLvT
sory for paste but outlook drop my emails for spam :)
Hello, when I'm using postsrsd with spamassassin SPF checks all e-mail have
SPF_FAIL=0.001
I'm trying with use_newest_received_spf_header 1 but this same issue
spamassassin have problem with reconize SPF for mail's with SRS headers
Jan 10 09:15:24 mail3 amavis[5068]: (05068-01-3) SA dbg: spf: ch
test
Hello, when I'm using postsrsd with spamassassin SPF checks all e-mail have
SPF_FAIL=0.001
I'm trying with use_newest_received_spf_header 1 but this same issue
spamassassin have problem with reconize SPF for mail's with SRS headers
Jan 10 09:15:24 mail3 amavis[5068]: (05068-01-3) SA dbg: spf: ch
Hello, when I'm using postsrsd with spamassassin SPF checks all e-mail have
SPF_FAIL=0.001
I'm trying with use_newest_received_spf_header 1 but this same issue
spamassassin have problem with reconize SPF for mail's with SRS headers
Jan 10 09:15:24 mail3 amavis[5068]: (05068-01-3) SA dbg: spf: ch
26 matches
Mail list logo
