On Fri, 20 Apr 2018, Bill Cole wrote:
On 20 Apr 2018, at 14:50 (-0400), John Hardin wrote:
Given your findings, I kinda suspect *all* of the tflags=multiple rules are
misbehaving from time to time under 3.3.1 - the compiled code may be
getting into an infinite loop somehow if the number if
On 20 Apr 2018, at 14:50 (-0400), John Hardin wrote:
Given your findings, I kinda suspect *all* of the tflags=multiple
rules are misbehaving from time to time under 3.3.1 - the compiled
code may be getting into an infinite loop somehow if the number if
*real* hits on the rule exceeds some
On Fri, 20 Apr 2018, Chris Conn wrote:
Yeah, because 3.4.x implements maxhits.
So, should I disable the __GENERATE_LEADS family for < 3.4.0? I suspect it
would be prudent, but I am surprised the other tflags=multiple rules aren't
also problematic in the same manner...
Hello,
I don`t
Yeah, because 3.4.x implements maxhits.
So, should I disable the __GENERATE_LEADS family for < 3.4.0? I
suspect it would be prudent, but I am surprised the other
tflags=multiple rules aren't also problematic in the same manner...
Hello,
I don`t think I am in a position to comment on
On Fri, 20 Apr 2018, Chris Conn wrote:
WTF? If tflags=multiple is supported at all, it should behave properly
(i.e. not hitting over and over on the *same bit of text*).
maxhits was implemented after 3.3.1; is it possible that there are just a
*lot* of instances of "your business" in that
WTF? If tflags=multiple is supported at all, it should behave properly
(i.e. not hitting over and over on the *same bit of text*).
maxhits was implemented after 3.3.1; is it possible that there are
just a *lot* of instances of "your business" in that test message, and
it's simply hitting
On Fri, 20 Apr 2018, Chris Conn wrote:
On 4/18/2018 10:32 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Chris Conn skrev den 2018-04-18 16:00:
this is a relatively old install, SA 3.3.1 on Centos6 (stock RPMs)
maybe solved in centos7 ?
I believe I found the issue. On my Centos6 boxes with SA 3.3.1 (the
On 4/18/2018 10:32 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Chris Conn skrev den 2018-04-18 16:00:
this is a relatively old install, SA 3.3.1 on Centos6 (stock RPMs)
maybe solved in centos7 ?
i do not use precompiled problems
Hello,
I believe I found the issue. On my Centos6 boxes with SA 3.3.1 (the
On Fri, 20 Apr 2018, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
If RH/CentOS chose to simply remove those plugins, I would follow like and
kind for building the package.
+1
--
Kevin A. McGrail
Asst. Treasurer & VP Fundraising, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
If RH/CentOS chose to simply remove those plugins, I would follow like and
kind for building the package.
--
Kevin A. McGrail
Asst. Treasurer & VP Fundraising, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171
On Fri, Apr
Neither spamassassin-3.4.0-2.el7.src.rpm (CentOS 7.4) nor
spamassassin-3.4.1-17.fc27.src.rpm have the mentioned files in their
source at all.
Reio
On 20.04.18 17:06, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Giovanni, I was considering killing it as well. And I was going to
look at how CentOS handled this in
Giovanni, I was considering killing it as well. And I was going to look at
how CentOS handled this in the 3.4.1 for their rpms.
--
Kevin A. McGrail
Asst. Treasurer & VP Fundraising, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail -
On 04/20/18 13:53, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> FYI, I'm well aware of the 3.4 test issue with rulesrc. I have it symlinked
> to a checkout for my purposes. I'll document that more.
>
> I am using CentOS 7 as well for testing and not aware of these perl
> dependency issues you are having.
I suspect rpmbuild gleans the requirements from script files when building.
Mail-SpamAssassin-3.4.2/lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/RabinKarpBody.pm:use
RabinKarpAccel;
Mail-SpamAssassin-3.4.2/lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Util/MemoryDump.pm:use
Devel::Size qw(size total_size);
FYI, I'm well aware of the 3.4 test issue with rulesrc. I have it
symlinked to a checkout for my purposes. I'll document that more.
I am using CentOS 7 as well for testing and not aware of these perl
dependency issues you are having. Please elaborate further.
--
Kevin A. McGrail
Asst.
Am Donnerstag, 19. April 2018, 20:53:19 CEST schrieb Rainer Dorsch:
Thank you for your reply, Jesse.
Hmm.no cd /home/rd/ does not help and there is no lib directory in there
you don't need the lib/ directory there.
in fact, the problem is that in original directory perl could not check
On 20.04.18 9:50, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
On 04/19/18 09:24, Reio Remma wrote:
[...]
*Update:* none of the --option= switches work.
handle_user (userdir) unable to find user: '' is caused because I have the
-username switch as --username=amavis instead of --username amavis
It worked in 3.4.1.
On 20.04.18 9:50, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
On 04/19/18 09:24, Reio Remma wrote:
[...]
*Update:* none of the --option= switches work.
handle_user (userdir) unable to find user: '' is caused because I have the
-username switch as --username=amavis instead of --username amavis
It worked in 3.4.1.
On 04/19/18 09:24, Reio Remma wrote:
[...]
> *Update:* none of the --option= switches work.
>
> handle_user (userdir) unable to find user: '' is caused because I have the
> -username switch as --username=amavis instead of --username amavis
>
> It worked in 3.4.1.
>
> Is it at all possible
On 04/19/18 18:54, Reio Remma wrote:
> I ran make test now - not exactly a pass.
>
cc dev@, I think this is a regression.
> There were lots of complaints about: "Maybe you need to kill a running spamd
> process?" There was no spamd running.
>
> The RPM is actually working nicely on our
20 matches
Mail list logo
