Spamassassin and spamc do not use same rules

2018-04-24 Thread Paul R. Ganci
I recently setup a new install of an email server on a CentOS 7 server. Everything is working correctly except for this problem:  >spamassassin --test-mode Content analysis details:   (9.6 points, 5.0 required)  pts rule name  description --

Re: anyone recognize these headers? From SA or are they from another spam product?

2018-04-24 Thread Bill Cole
On 24 Apr 2018, at 20:10 (-0400), L A Walsh wrote: These headers (not these values) are in most or all of my emails. In one email on the net they were adjacent to SA's headers (but they aren't in my emails). I was wondering if anyone knew what product might be inserting these headers: X-CSC:

anyone recognize these headers? From SA or are they from another spam product?

2018-04-24 Thread L A Walsh
These headers (not these values) are in most or all of my emails. In one email on the net they were adjacent to SA's headers (but they aren't in my emails). I was wondering if anyone knew what product might be inserting these headers: X-CSC: 0 X-CHA: v=1.1

Re: plugin: eval failed: __alarm__ignore__(xxx) how to troubleshoot

2018-04-24 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
Pedro, ideas are great but patches are essential. If you are interested in said feature, please consider submitting a patch to achieve it. Especially because I can guarantee you that very few people will put any cycles on a 3.3.X release issue. -- Kevin A. McGrail Asst. Treasurer & VP