On 2018-05-30 15:49, Palvelin Postmaster wrote:
> Why does this list apparently use the original From header of the
> poster’s message and doesn't set a Reply-To header at all?
Because that is the only right way.
A list manager has no business modifying the contents of posted
messages. It shoul
On 05/30/2018 04:02 PM, RW wrote:
OK, but when you said "The failure seems to be a result of how DMARC
amalgamates the two with published policies" I thought you were claiming
some kind of anomalous behaviour.
Ah. Sorry for the confusion.
It's surely obvious that rewriting the envelope sende
On Wed, 30 May 2018 12:47:42 -0600
Grant Taylor wrote:
> On 05/30/2018 12:08 PM, RW wrote:
> > SPF passes on the rewritten envelope address, so it's not aligned
> > and it's just a matter of whether there's an aligned dkim pass.
>
> It depends on what the Forensic Report ("fo") option is set to
On 30 May 2018, at 17:19 (-0400), Luis E. Muñoz wrote:
On 30 May 2018, at 13:54, Bill Cole wrote:
On 30 May 2018, at 14:51 (-0400), Grant Taylor wrote:
Since Qualcom transferred the Eudora IP to the Computer History
Museum and open sourced the source code, I expect that we will be
seeing mo
On 30 May 2018, at 14:30, Bill Cole wrote:
And if you can imagine this, both Thunderbird and MailMate choke on
large mailboxes *even more* than Mail.app does.
I haven't had MM "choke" on large mailboxes in recent years. I wish
Benny would just declare a 2.0 release to make it clear that MM t
On 30 May 2018, at 14:47 (-0400), Charles Sprickman wrote:
All email clients “generally suck”. Thunderbird is not even
actively developed anymore last I checked,
Check again. That's not been true for quite a while. I just dusted off
TBird for the first time in 2 years and was treated to an u
On 30 May 2018, at 13:54, Bill Cole wrote:
On 30 May 2018, at 14:51 (-0400), Grant Taylor wrote:
Since Qualcom transferred the Eudora IP to the Computer History
Museum and open sourced the source code, I expect that we will be
seeing movement there in. I think I've seen some references to
p
On 30/05/2018 17:37, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> it seems that spamcannibal blacklist is dead, or at least its DNS has
> expired:
>
> Domain Name: SPAMCANNIBAL.ORG
> Updated Date: 2018-05-30T03:16:26Z
> Name Server: NS1.RENEWYOURNAME.NET
> Name Server: NS2.RENEWYOURNAME.NET
>
> a
On 30 May 2018, at 14:51 (-0400), Grant Taylor wrote:
> Since Qualcom transferred the Eudora IP to the Computer History Museum and
> open sourced the source code, I expect that we will be seeing movement there
> in. I think I've seen some references to projects to resurrect the code base
> wit
On 05/30/2018 12:47 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
If I had a better option than some old command-line mess, I’d use it.
Every 3-4 years I go on a hunt for a new Mac mail client and I always
come up empty. I’ve tried MailMate, Thunderbird, Postbox and just keep
coming back to the (neglected) Mai
On 05/30/2018 12:08 PM, RW wrote:
SPF passes on the rewritten envelope address, so it's not aligned and
it's just a matter of whether there's an aligned dkim pass.
It depends on what the Forensic Report ("fo") option is set to in the
published DMARC policy. Domain owners / record publishers c
> On May 30, 2018, at 10:25 AM, Bill Cole
> wrote:
>
> On 30 May 2018, at 10:00, Palvelin Postmaster wrote:
>
>>> On 30 May 2018, at 16:48, Antony Stone
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wednesday 30 May 2018 at 15:33:13, Palvelin Postmaster wrote:
>>>
> On 30 May 2018, at 16:06, Matus UHLAR - fa
On Wed, 30 May 2018 11:45:12 -0600
Grant Taylor wrote:
> On 05/30/2018 09:34 AM, Grant Taylor wrote:
> > Now to see what sort of DMARC notifications (if any) I get for this
> > reply.
>
> I have received four DMARC auth-failure notifications (thus far) in
> response to my message to the SpamAs
On 05/30/2018 09:34 AM, Grant Taylor wrote:
Now to see what sort of DMARC notifications (if any) I get for this reply.
I have received four DMARC auth-failure notifications (thus far) in
response to my message to the SpamAssassin Users mailing list.
It looks like the reports are indicating t
On 05/30/2018 08:43 AM, Bill Cole wrote:
Note that changing the From header would break all DKIM signatures and
forcing a Reply-To would break many.
That's where validating & striping DKIM signatures as the message enters
the list comes into play. Preferably followed up with DKIM signing as
On 30 May 2018, at 10:25, Bill Cole wrote:
On 30 May 2018, at 10:00, Palvelin Postmaster wrote:
On 30 May 2018, at 16:48, Antony Stone
wrote:
On Wednesday 30 May 2018 at 15:33:13, Palvelin Postmaster wrote:
On 30 May 2018, at 16:06, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
On 30.05.18 15:49, Palv
On 30 May 2018, at 8:49, Palvelin Postmaster wrote:
Why does this list apparently use the original From header of the
poster’s message and doesn't set a Reply-To header at all?
1. Traditional standard practice. Doing otherwise in either case would
offend more people than sticking with the han
On 05/30/2018 02:35 PM, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
What happens when your coitus with Spamhaus is interrupted by a man
in the middle? I mean someone that either cuts your link or plays the
role of your partner while delivering poisoned answers? Good luck...
doesn't happen. I only use lists which
On 30 May 2018, at 10:00, Palvelin Postmaster wrote:
On 30 May 2018, at 16:48, Antony Stone
wrote:
On Wednesday 30 May 2018 at 15:33:13, Palvelin Postmaster wrote:
On 30 May 2018, at 16:06, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
On 30.05.18 15:49, Palvelin Postmaster wrote:
Hitting reply sends t
> On 30 May 2018, at 16:48, Antony Stone
> wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 30 May 2018 at 15:33:13, Palvelin Postmaster wrote:
>
>>> On 30 May 2018, at 16:06, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 30.05.18 15:49, Palvelin Postmaster wrote:
Hitting reply sends the response to poster dir
On Wednesday 30 May 2018 at 15:33:13, Palvelin Postmaster wrote:
> > On 30 May 2018, at 16:06, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
> > wrote:
> >
> > On 30.05.18 15:49, Palvelin Postmaster wrote:
> >> Hitting reply sends the response to poster directly
> >
> > get a mail client that supports mailing lists.
> On 30 May 2018, at 16:06, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
> On 30.05.18 15:49, Palvelin Postmaster wrote:
>
>> Hitting reply sends the response to poster directly
>
> get a mail client that supports mailing lists. Mozilla should do.
I see, the 'Mozzilla or stfu' policy ;D
>> and DMARC
Palvelin Postmaster schrieb am 30.05.2018 um 14:49:
Why does this list apparently use the original From header of the poster’s
message and doesn't set a Reply-To header at all?
Hitting reply sends the response to poster directly and DMARC failures occur
when posting to list. Not very elegant.
On 30.05.18 15:49, Palvelin Postmaster wrote:
Why does this list apparently use the original From header of the poster’s
message and doesn't set a Reply-To header at all?
because it's the standard behaviour.
Hitting reply sends the response to poster directly
get a mail client that supports
Why does this list apparently use the original From header of the poster’s
message and doesn't set a Reply-To header at all?
Hitting reply sends the response to poster directly and DMARC failures occur
when posting to list. Not very elegant.
On 30.05.18 15:12, Palvelin Postmaster wrote:
I prepend my spam emails’ subject fields with a specific string to indicate
spam, like many do, I presume. Will that string get noticed by bayes and
if so, should I do something to prevent it?
On 30 May 2018, at 15:21, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrot
> On 30 May 2018, at 15:21, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
> On 30.05.18 15:12, Palvelin Postmaster wrote:
>> I prepend my spam emails’ subject fields with a specific string to indicate
>> spam, like many do, I presume. Will that string get noticed by bayes and
>> if so, should I do somethin
What happens when your coitus with Spamhaus is interrupted by a man in the
middle? I mean someone that either cuts your link or plays the role of your
partner while delivering poisoned answers? Good luck...
On 30.05.18 15:12, Palvelin Postmaster wrote:
I prepend my spam emails’ subject fields with a specific string to indicate
spam, like many do, I presume. Will that string get noticed by bayes and
if so, should I do something to prevent it?
most probably, yes.
However, not by your bayes, unless
Silly question or not, here goes:
I prepend my spam emails’ subject fields with a specific string to indicate
spam, like many do, I presume. Will that string get noticed by bayes and if so,
should I do something to prevent it?
--
Palvelin.fi Hostmaster
postmas...@palvelin.fi
Hello,
it seems that spamcannibal blacklist is dead, or at least its DNS has
expired:
Domain Name: SPAMCANNIBAL.ORG
Updated Date: 2018-05-30T03:16:26Z
Name Server: NS1.RENEWYOURNAME.NET
Name Server: NS2.RENEWYOURNAME.NET
and, of course:
114.95.168.62.bl.spamcannibal.org. 86385 IN A 91.195.24
31 matches
Mail list logo
