Do you have any sample, Rupert?
>On Saturday, September 1, 2018, 7:02:20 AM GMT+2, Rupert Gallagher
wrote: > >Do you have an SA rule for it?Â
Of course I do.
On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 09:35, Pedro David Marco wrote:
> Do you have any sample, Rupert?
>
>>On Saturday, September 1, 2018, 7:02:20 AM GMT+2, Rupert Gallagher
>> wrote:
>>
>>Do you have an SA rule for it?
On Saturday 01 September 2018 at 14:09:52, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 09:35, Pedro David Marco wrote:
> >
> >> On Saturday, September 1, 2018, 7:02:20 AM GMT+2, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
> > >
> > > Do you have an SA rule for it?
> >
> > Do you have any sample, Rupert?
>
> Of
This is a subject line:
Re: Habemus APP LG 😉
On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 14:15, Antony Stone
wrote:
> On Saturday 01 September 2018 at 14:09:52, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 09:35, Pedro David Marco wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Saturday, September 1, 2018, 7:02:20 AM GMT+2, Rupert Ga
On Fri, 31 Aug 2018, John Hardin wrote:
None of the masscheck corpora that hit __HDR_ORDER_FTSDMC also
hit ALL_TRUSTED (or at least the portion is so small it falls off
the bottom of the report) so I don't feel too worried about adding
either !ALL_TRUSTED or __ANY_EXTERNAL (or potentially b
On Fri, 31 Aug 2018, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Note that I list internal clients as trusted, not as internal.
Maybe this is the problem. Long time ago I learned to configure
dynamic IP addresses (dialups) as trusted, but not as internal.
On 31.08.18 12:07, John Hardin wrote:
Hrm. Not sure
On Sat, 1 Sep 2018, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
This is a subject line:
Re: Habemus APP LG 😉
Please paste the entire raw message, all headers included (with recipient
sanitization if needed) to something like pastebin so that we can see all
of it. The version that your MUA displays to you is no
On Fri, 31 Aug 2018 16:16:43 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Aug 2018, John Hardin wrote:
>
> > None of the masscheck corpora that hit __HDR_ORDER_FTSDMC also
> > hit ALL_TRUSTED (or at least the portion is so small it falls off
> > the bottom of the report) so I don't feel too wo
On Sat, 1 Sep 2018, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
This is a subject line:
Re: Habemus APP LG 😉
Do you understand that is not an image (EG jpg, png, or tiff) but a UTF-8 code
point ("emoji" character) glyph.
We cannot tell because you haven't provided us with an actual message but I'm
going t
On Sat, 1 Sep 2018, David B Funk wrote:
On Sat, 1 Sep 2018, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
This is a subject line:
Re: Habemus APP LG 😉
Do you understand that is not an image (EG jpg, png, or tiff) but a UTF-8
code point ("emoji" character) glyph.
We cannot tell because you haven't provided
On Sat, 1 Sep 2018, RW wrote:
On Fri, 31 Aug 2018 16:16:43 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 31 Aug 2018, John Hardin wrote:
None of the masscheck corpora that hit __HDR_ORDER_FTSDMC also
hit ALL_TRUSTED (or at least the portion is so small it falls off
the bottom of the report) so
On 1 Sep 2018, at 18:22 (-0400), David B Funk wrote:
On the other-hand, if you want to decode the subject line and then
pattern-match against all the possible UTF-8 emojies, you're going to
end up with a rather unwieldy rule.
SA "header" rules match against decoded headers, not the Base64 or
12 matches
Mail list logo
