On Tue, 2018-12-11 at 19:00 -0500, Bill Cole wrote:
> On 11 Dec 2018, at 16:37, Chris Pollock wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2018-12-10 at 13:09 -0500, Bill Cole wrote:
>
> [...]
> > > Anyway, as of today I've capped those 2 subrules at levels which
> > > leave ample space to still match the target spam. S
On 11 Dec 2018, at 16:37, Chris Pollock wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-12-10 at 13:09 -0500, Bill Cole wrote:
[...]
>> Anyway, as of today I've capped those 2 subrules at levels which
>> leave ample space to still match the target spam. Should show up in
>> tomorrow's update.
I was wrong. The addition of
On Mon, 2018-12-10 at 13:09 -0500, Bill Cole wrote:
> On 9 Dec 2018, at 18:23, Chris Pollock wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2018-12-09 at 13:06 -0500, Bill Cole wrote:
> > > On 9 Dec 2018, at 12:04, Chris Pollock wrote:
> > >
> > > > This is probably very trivial and doesn't affect anything
> > > > except
regex rule, but
I don't recall off the top of my head who that was.
I was provided a spample by private email (and suggested they post it
here) and it hits T_FROM_2_EMAILS from 20_khop_experimental.cf
https://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20181211-r1848660-n/T_FROM_2_EMAILS/detail
Perhaps I&
On Tue, 11 Dec 2018, Chris Pollock wrote:
It's got the potential to be VERY noisy (as you've discovered) while
not really providing much useful info. Not a big deal on a small
system.
I could just go through and comment out this line in my local.cf
add_header all Subtest Ran _SUBTESTS(,)_
but
Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 12/10/2018 2:49 PM, Kris Deugau wrote:
The master/reference files are stored in a Subversion repository.
Commits to particular paths trigger the creation of the tarball, SHA*
hash files, and GPG signature. A cron job on our DNS master server
polls the repository to se
On Mon, 2018-12-10 at 13:09 -0500, Bill Cole wrote:
> On 9 Dec 2018, at 18:23, Chris Pollock wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2018-12-09 at 13:06 -0500, Bill Cole wrote:
> > > On 9 Dec 2018, at 12:04, Chris Pollock wrote:
> > >
> > > > This is probably very trivial and doesn't affect anything
> > > > except
On 11 Dec 2018, at 7:52, RW wrote:
On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 16:02:33 -0500
Bill Cole wrote:
On 10 Dec 2018, at 14:13, RW wrote:
On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 12:45:53 -0500
Mark London wrote:
Hi - Here's another form of obfuscation spam. This time, not a
porn blackmail one. Almost the whole text is ob
On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 16:02:33 -0500
Bill Cole wrote:
> On 10 Dec 2018, at 14:13, RW wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 12:45:53 -0500
> > Mark London wrote:
> >
> >> Hi - Here's another form of obfuscation spam. This time, not a
> >> porn blackmail one. Almost the whole text is obfuscated.
> >>
