Hello,
with a recent update to the ruleset, we're encountering certain mails,
which cause the rule-evaluation to use 100% cpu.
The effect was reproduced with Proxmox Mailgateway 5.2 (running
Spamassassin 3.4.2 ) and Ubuntu 19.04 (also running Spamassassin 3.4.2)
After some debugging the issue
Attempting to answer all your questions related to zimbra
Zimbra doesn't do any training until it is kicked off by cron for the zimbra
user... Training a message as spam from the MUA interface sends the email to a
special spam account... Training messages as not spam goes to a special ham
On 28 May 2019, at 14:55, Emanuel Gonzalez wrote:
Hello, i updated perl via yum.
# spamassassin --version
SpamAssassin version 3.4.2
running on Perl version 5.16.3
CentOS Linux release 7.6.1810 (Core)
x86_64
I see this error:
May 28 15:40:03 server spamd[17267]: spamd: error: addr is not
Hello, i updated perl via yum.
# spamassassin --version
SpamAssassin version 3.4.2
running on Perl version 5.16.3
CentOS Linux release 7.6.1810 (Core)
x86_64
I see this error:
May 28 15:40:03 server spamd[17267]: spamd: error: addr is not a string at
On 28.05.19 15:34, hg user wrote:
I did some more research and I think I have to report the new discovery so
that the thread can be useful to other Readers.
First:
0.000 0 5232 0 non-token data: nspam
0.000 0 70408 0 non-token data: nham
0.000
On Tue, 28 May 2019 15:42:05 +
David Jones wrote:
> On 5/27/19 5:13 PM, hg user wrote:
> > The server was installed and configured by a "zimbra man", a person
> > I fully trust. Since I manage a commercial antivirus/antispam
> > solution that is not properly working for the italian language,
On 5/27/19 5:13 PM, hg user wrote:
> The server was installed and configured by a "zimbra man", a person I
> fully trust. Since I manage a commercial antivirus/antispam solution
> that is not properly working for the italian language, I was tasked to
> join the project in order to understand if
On Tue, 28 May 2019 15:34:06 +0200
hg user wrote:
> Fourth:
> I added a dbg statement to bayes.pm, sub tokenize, to print the
> tokens it extracts from the message.
> I agree with some, I don't with others. I'd like to know if there is
> some doc that lists why tokens are extracted this way (some
On Mon, 27 May 2019 19:38:55 -0500
Andy Howell wrote:
> On 5/27/19 6:43 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > Am 28.05.19 um 01:05 schrieb Andy Howell:
> >> How do I get spamassassin to honor the setting of bayes_path in
> >> /etc/spamassassin/local.cf ? bayes_path
> >>
I did some more research and I think I have to report the new discovery so
that the thread can be useful to other Readers.
First:
0.000 0 5232 0 non-token data: nspam
0.000 0 70408 0 non-token data: nham
0.000 0 388070 0
On 28.05.19 00:13, hg user wrote:
The server was installed and configured by a "zimbra man", a person I fully
trust. Since I manage a commercial antivirus/antispam solution that is not
properly working for the italian language, I was tasked to join the project
in order to understand if we could
On Mon, 27 May 2019 18:04:35 +0200 hg user wrote:
I was writing a message requesting advice on bayes_ignore_header
since I was sure something was wrong when I decided to have a look at
spamassassin -D bayes output... and I was shocked by what I saw !
x-spam-relays-external lists all the hops of
12 matches
Mail list logo
