Rupert Gallagher skrev den 2020-03-05 00:27:
Fails with travelling clients.
my custommers want vacation without stress :=)
On 04 Mar 2020, at 16:27, Rupert Gallagher wrote:
> Fails with travelling clients.
Depends. I block several countries from accessing my mail server. If someone
travels to one of those countries, they can use webmail to access their mail.
There are always options.
However, most people simply us
Fails with travelling clients.
Original Message
On Mar 3, 2020, 16:49, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> Marc Roos skrev den 2020-03-03 16:15:
>> Use ipset, hardly causing any latency using 50k entries.
>
> i dont need to block 50k entries, but only whitelist few accepted client
> ips, wh
On 4 Mar 2020, at 14:43, RW wrote:
On Tue, 03 Mar 2020 16:05:31 -0800
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
2FA isn't going to help unless 2FA could be applied to the SMTP Auth
port.
Sometime 2FA on webmail is combined with separate autogenerated
passwords for pop/imap/submission.
A.k.a. "application p
On Tue, 03 Mar 2020 16:05:31 -0800
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> 2FA isn't going to help unless 2FA could be applied to the SMTP Auth
> port.
Sometime 2FA on webmail is combined with separate autogenerated
passwords for pop/imap/submission.
If password rotating is out of the question, you might want to check your IPs
against blacklists multiple times at a day, it wouldn't stop it but it may
notify you earlier to stop an outbreak.
Other thing that comes to mind is, you may try rate limiting your users and
setup a cron to monitor th