On Tue, 10 Nov 2020, Benny Pedersen wrote:
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple;
s=n4atlko3yvgxyqpwp7palysab6occe3l; d=fing.com; t=1604971038;
h=From:To:Message-ID:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Date;
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple;
s=n4atlko3yvgxyqpwp7palysab6occe3l; d=fing.com; t=1604971038;
h=From:To:Message-ID:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Date;
bh=0LT5Ztzk2B+Ecm2NPRzroGl6fTFNX9TpP6X0036qmf4=;
Matus UHLAR - fantomas skrev den 2020-11-09 14:43:
no, amavis processes all mail under single user, usually "amavis".
user prefs in sql is still supported in spamassassin even for system
users in the host
and amavisd have usermaps to sa_users, so its all supported
but the gaviat is more
Alex skrev den 2020-11-09 14:37:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPAMASSASSIN/UsingSQL
create pr user rules, set the scores default to 0
in sql, then change scorees pr user, easy :=)
and amavisd have sa_userprefs maps to sa_user, its just not that easy to
make work as intended
On 11/9/20 3:18 PM, RW wrote:
> When you say FP do you mean that ch.com was listed in a domain
> blocklist?
yes, the "ch.com" was listed in one of the domain blocklists. And as the
customer used his own domain "www.ch" as footer it got caught by the
lookup for "ch.com" which seems to be a
On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 08:26:59 +0100
Tobi wrote:
> John,
>
> > Because I think that suppressing that behavior for valid TLDs would
> > be
> an appropriate modification to avoid potential URIBL FPs
>
> fully agree. SA should not append .com if the domain has a valid tld
> and a domain label.
On 09.11.20 08:37, Alex wrote:
I'm aware of the ability to store user prefs in mysql, like whether to
use bayes or razor, but is it possible to have rules on a per-user
basis with SA 3.4.4 and amavis?
no, amavis processes all mail under single user, usually "amavis".
you probably could make
Hi,
I'm aware of the ability to store user prefs in mysql, like whether to
use bayes or razor, but is it possible to have rules on a per-user
basis with SA 3.4.4 and amavis?
I realize I could write a meta rule that combines a rule with a
recipient address, for example, but ideally I'd like to
On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 12:44:04 +
RW wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Nov 2020 19:49:20 -0500
> Rob McEwen wrote:
>
> > Daryl,
> >
> > Can you please post a copy of the raw email message - with headers
> > - perhaps with your own user's email address (and name?) masked out
> > (change to "")
>
>
On Sun, 8 Nov 2020 19:49:20 -0500
Rob McEwen wrote:
> Daryl,
>
> Can you please post a copy of the raw email message - with headers -
> perhaps with your own user's email address (and name?) masked out
> (change to "")
It's best to leave it syntactically correct and with
On 09.11.20 05:07, Daryl Rose wrote:
Sorry, I deleted it right away. I normally delete that crap as soon as it
comes in. I'll remember to keep it next time I get something so I can
post the headers.
i keep spam ans phishes in special mail directories for later examination
On Sun, Nov 8,
Sorry, I deleted it right away. I normally delete that crap as soon as it
comes in. I'll remember to keep it next time I get something so I can
post the headers.
Daryl
On Sun, Nov 8, 2020 at 6:49 PM Rob McEwen wrote:
> Daryl,
>
> Can you please post a copy of the raw email message - with
Dan Malm skrev den 2020-11-09 10:31:
I just consider free tlds spam (at least some of them):
thanks, will try to add it to rule set i have here, ly tld is the one i
like to add, you have it outside of freemail so this is what i will
maybe change it to, so it just being freemail rule hits
On 2020-11-09 09:10, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> maybe if it could be done in freemail ?
>
> is it inccorect bark to bark on ?
>
> i write it to get some debate on it, not to begin implementing anything yet
I just consider free tlds spam (at least some of them):
header
maybe if it could be done in freemail ?
is it inccorect bark to bark on ?
i write it to get some debate on it, not to begin implementing anything
yet
15 matches
Mail list logo
