Re: Update SA on CentOS

2021-04-04 Thread Simon Wilson
- Message from Bill Cole -    Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2021 15:16:32 -0400    From: Bill Cole Subject: Re: Update SA on CentOS      To: users@spamassassin.apache.org On 4 Apr 2021, at 0:19, Simon Wilson wrote: CentOS / RHEL backport critical security fixes into the stock versions...

Problem installing sa on my pi 3b+

2021-04-04 Thread spamassassin
Hi there, when running a 'sudo apt-get install spamassassin' on my raspian pi 3b+ i keep running into a problem with sa-compile: sa-compile (3.4.2-1+deb10u3) wird eingerichtet ... Running sa-compile (may take a long time) In file included from /usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/perl/5.28/CORE/perl.

Re: Update SA on CentOS

2021-04-04 Thread Bill Cole
On 4 Apr 2021, at 0:19, Simon Wilson wrote: CentOS / RHEL backport critical security fixes into the stock versions... you lose that as soon as you go 'roll-your-own'. Not a real feature IF you're keeping up with SA releases. Arguably an anti-feature. Critical security fixes for SA are integra

Re: google.com spam

2021-04-04 Thread RW
On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 16:47:18 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > >> On 04.04.21 13:09, Benny Pedersen wrote: > >> >change score to 7.5 > >> >change score to -3.5 > > >On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 13:21:08 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > >> I prefer to solve problems instead of playing with sco

Re: google.com spam

2021-04-04 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 04.04.21 13:09, Benny Pedersen wrote: >change score to 7.5 >change score to -3.5 On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 13:21:08 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: I prefer to solve problems instead of playing with scores. It seems that abusers have worked around SA by using google domains and addresses for

Re: google.com spam

2021-04-04 Thread RW
On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 13:21:08 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 04.04.21 13:09, Benny Pedersen wrote: > >change score to 7.5 > >change score to -3.5 > > I prefer to solve problems instead of playing with scores. > > It seems that abusers have worked around SA by using google domains > an

Re: google.com spam

2021-04-04 Thread @lbutlr
On 04 Apr 2021, at 05:21, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 04.04.21 13:09, Benny Pedersen wrote: >> change score to 7.5 >> change score to -3.5 > > I prefer to solve problems instead of playing with scores. The way that SA solves problems is by changing score values. The entire foundation of

Re: google.com spam

2021-04-04 Thread Benny Pedersen
On 2021-04-04 13:21, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 04.04.21 13:09, Benny Pedersen wrote: change score to 7.5 change score to -3.5 I prefer to solve problems instead of playing with scores. first rule hits is local rule with imho to low score for problems on spamassassin rules :-) meta

Re: google.com spam

2021-04-04 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 2021-04-04 12:54, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: I have received spam from: From: "Linda marry (via Google Drive)" it wasn't catches because of: 60_whitelist_auth.cf:def_welcomelist_auth *@google.com Now that users can abuse google.com domain, isn't it time to remove *@google.com from de

Re: google.com spam

2021-04-04 Thread Benny Pedersen
On 2021-04-04 12:54, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: Hello, I have received spam from: From: "Linda marry (via Google Drive)" it wasn't catches because of: 60_whitelist_auth.cf:def_welcomelist_auth *@google.com Now that users can abuse google.com domain, isn't it time to remove *@google.com

google.com spam

2021-04-04 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
Hello, I have received spam from: From: "Linda marry (via Google Drive)" it wasn't catches because of: 60_whitelist_auth.cf:def_welcomelist_auth *@google.com Now that users can abuse google.com domain, isn't it time to remove *@google.com from def_whitelist_* ? the full header: X-Spam-Repo