- Message from Bill Cole
-
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2021 15:16:32 -0400
From: Bill Cole
Subject: Re: Update SA on CentOS
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
On 4 Apr 2021, at 0:19, Simon Wilson wrote:
CentOS / RHEL backport critical security fixes into the stock
versions...
Hi there,
when running a 'sudo apt-get install spamassassin' on my raspian pi 3b+
i keep running into a problem with sa-compile:
sa-compile (3.4.2-1+deb10u3) wird eingerichtet ...
Running sa-compile (may take a long time)
In file included from
/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/perl/5.28/CORE/perl.
On 4 Apr 2021, at 0:19, Simon Wilson wrote:
CentOS / RHEL backport critical security fixes into the stock
versions... you lose that as soon as you go 'roll-your-own'.
Not a real feature IF you're keeping up with SA releases. Arguably an
anti-feature. Critical security fixes for SA are integra
On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 16:47:18 +0200
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >> On 04.04.21 13:09, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> >> >change score to 7.5
> >> >change score to -3.5
>
> >On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 13:21:08 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >> I prefer to solve problems instead of playing with sco
On 04.04.21 13:09, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>change score to 7.5
>change score to -3.5
On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 13:21:08 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I prefer to solve problems instead of playing with scores.
It seems that abusers have worked around SA by using google domains
and addresses for
On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 13:21:08 +0200
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 04.04.21 13:09, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> >change score to 7.5
> >change score to -3.5
>
> I prefer to solve problems instead of playing with scores.
>
> It seems that abusers have worked around SA by using google domains
> an
On 04 Apr 2021, at 05:21, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 04.04.21 13:09, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>> change score to 7.5
>> change score to -3.5
>
> I prefer to solve problems instead of playing with scores.
The way that SA solves problems is by changing score values.
The entire foundation of
On 2021-04-04 13:21, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 04.04.21 13:09, Benny Pedersen wrote:
change score to 7.5
change score to -3.5
I prefer to solve problems instead of playing with scores.
first rule hits is local rule with imho to low score for problems on
spamassassin rules :-)
meta
On 2021-04-04 12:54, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I have received spam from:
From: "Linda marry (via Google Drive)"
it wasn't catches because of:
60_whitelist_auth.cf:def_welcomelist_auth *@google.com
Now that users can abuse google.com domain, isn't it time to remove
*@google.com from de
On 2021-04-04 12:54, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Hello,
I have received spam from:
From: "Linda marry (via Google Drive)"
it wasn't catches because of:
60_whitelist_auth.cf:def_welcomelist_auth *@google.com
Now that users can abuse google.com domain, isn't it time to remove
*@google.com
Hello,
I have received spam from:
From: "Linda marry (via Google Drive)"
it wasn't catches because of:
60_whitelist_auth.cf:def_welcomelist_auth *@google.com
Now that users can abuse google.com domain, isn't it time to remove
*@google.com from def_whitelist_* ?
the full header:
X-Spam-Repo
11 matches
Mail list logo