--On Friday, October 08, 2021 2:04 PM +0200 Thomas Seilund
wrote:
When you say a rule hits do you then mean that the rule contribute to the
score? Can a rule hit and contribute with a value of zero to the score?
Setting a rule's score to zero (eg. in local.cf) disables the rule. This is
how
On 2021-10-08 13:32, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Hi Thomas, needing to lower your score to two or three implies To me
that your system could use some tweaking. In particular I would guess
that your Bayesian tokens need to be cleared.
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=7.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,
On 2021-10-08 13:24, Thomas Seilund wrote:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_50,HTML_MESSAGE,
autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=7.4 required=5.0
tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,
HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HTML_MESS
Hi Thomas, needing to lower your score to two or three implies To me that
your system could use some tweaking. In particular I would guess that your
Bayesian tokens need to be cleared.
As for the different scores, you would have to know the way that
spamassassin is being used on your system.
For
Dear all
If I look at the score reported from within my mail client Thunderbird I
see this section:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_50,HTML_MESSAGE,
HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG,MIME_HTML_ONLY,SPF_HELO_PASS,URIBL_BLACK
autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
If I run th
> Is it so that the list of rules only show rules that contribute to the
score?
Yes, only rules that contributed to the spam score are listed.
> What do you mean by a rule did not match?
SpamAssassin has hundreds/thousands of rules, each one looking at some
aspect of the email message. If the
On 10/8/21 12:00 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 08.10.21 um 11:18 schrieb Thomas Seilund:
Hi All
I run SA 3.4.2 on Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster)
If I look at incomming mails after SA has processed the incomming
mail then the list of SA rules that have been run is not the same for
all mails.
DNSWL is a whitelist for mailservers. So the tests based on that use the
IP that handed your trusted_networks the email.
Several tests are based on the transmitting server instead of just the
email contents, since contents can be convincing or not, if the server
is notorious for sending spam i
On 10/8/21 11:38 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 08.10.21 11:18, Thomas Seilund wrote:
I run SA 3.4.2 on Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster)
If I look at incomming mails after SA has processed the incomming
mail then the list of SA rules that have been run is not the same for
all mails.
Bel
On 08.10.21 11:18, Thomas Seilund wrote:
I run SA 3.4.2 on Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster)
If I look at incomming mails after SA has processed the incomming mail
then the list of SA rules that have been run is not the same for all
mails.
Below are to examples:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 req
Hi All
I run SA 3.4.2 on Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster)
If I look at incomming mails after SA has processed the incomming mail
then the list of SA rules that have been run is not the same for all mails.
Below are to examples:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNE
11 matches
Mail list logo
