On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 07:49:00PM -0800, John Hardin wrote:
>
> What would be helpful here would be logging of when a rule *starts*
> evaluation. Normally that would be painful, but for tracking a runaway it
> would be useful. Perhaps I can code up something to capture that and log it
> on a time
On Fri, 12 Nov 2021, Philip Prindeville wrote:
I got the message, saved it to a flat file, and ran "spamassassin -t -D rules <
netdev.eml" and saw:
...
Nov 12 11:45:38.048 [36367] dbg: rules: ran eval rule __ANY_TEXT_ATTACH_DOC
==> got hit (1)
...
Nov 12 11:45:38.063 [36367] dbg: rules: r
On 11/12/21 00:43, Loren Wilton wrote:
I have to admit I'd never paid much attention to the RCVD_IN_DNSWL_*
scores on spam before.
Looking at spam for last month, I don't have a single RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED.
But I do have 12 pretty blatent spams that hit RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI.
It makes me wonder just ho
> On Nov 9, 2021, at 6:49 AM, Jared Hall wrote:
>
> On 11/8/2021 11:36 PM, Peter wrote:
>> It seems that people aren't taking google as seriously any more.
> First came Freemail. Then came SpamAssassin. I DO think that people take
> Google seriously. There are just so many ways to deal wit
Hi,
I got an email from net...@vger.kernel.org that was a lengthy (422K) regression
test report from a patch someone had submitted.
I got the message, saved it to a flat file, and ran "spamassassin -t -D rules <
netdev.eml" and saw:
...
Nov 12 11:45:38.048 [36367] dbg: rules: ran eval rule __A
On 2021-11-12 at 04:33:34 UTC-0500 (Fri, 12 Nov 2021 10:33:34 +0100)
Philipp Ewald
is rumored to have said:
Hi folks,
it's seems to be that spamassins dont check non ASCII Base64 decodes
Mails.
I cannot make that line of text into a coherent English sentence.
Content-Type: text/html; cha
Arne Jensen writes:
> Den 11-11-2021 kl. 20:21 skrev Greg Troxel:
>> It's a really interesting question what DNSWL_MED ought to be for score.
>> Given what MED is supposed to be:
>>
>>MediumRare spam occurrences, corrected promptly.
>>
>> -2.3 points seems entirely reasonable.
>>
>> But
Arne Jensen writes:
> Den 12-11-2021 kl. 00:43 skrev Loren Wilton:
>> I have to admit I'd never paid much attention to the RCVD_IN_DNSWL_*
>> scores on spam before.
> [...]
>> Looking at spam for last month, [...]
>>
>> But I do have 12 pretty blatent spams that hit RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI.
>> It makes
Hi folks,
it's seems to be that spamassins dont check non ASCII Base64 decodes Mails.
Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
[BAYES_99=3.5, BAYES_999=5, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.723,
RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.347, RCVD
