Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 02:35:25PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> is it possible to match message headers in rfc822 atttachments?
>
> from what I know, "header" rules only apply to mail headers and
mimeheader
> only apply to mime headers.
>
> body and rawbo
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 05:11:47PM +0300, Henrik K wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 03:59:36PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > On 26.04.22 16:11, Henrik K wrote:
> > > Maybe a bit safer version that doesn't log huge strings and run wild
> > >
> > > full FOO /^(?=.*?\nContent-Type:
> > >
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 03:59:36PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 26.04.22 16:11, Henrik K wrote:
> > Maybe a bit safer version that doesn't log huge strings and run wild
> >
> > full FOO /^(?=.*?\nContent-Type:
> > message\/rfc822.{0,1024}?\nReceived:(?:[^\n]{1,100}\n\s{1,100}){0,3}[^
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 02:35:25PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> is it possible to match message headers in rfc822 atttachments?
>
> from what I know, "header" rules only apply to mail headers and mimeheader
> only apply to mime headers.
>
> body and rawbody afaik only search in bodies of
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 04:04:13PM +0300, Henrik K wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 02:35:25PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > is it possible to match message headers in rfc822 atttachments?
> >
> > from what I know, "header" rules only apply to mail headers and mimeheader
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 02:35:25PM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> is it possible to match message headers in rfc822 atttachments?
>
> from what I know, "header" rules only apply to mail headers and mimeheader
> only apply to mime headers.
>
> body and rawbody afaik only search
Hello,
is it possible to match message headers in rfc822 atttachments?
from what I know, "header" rules only apply to mail headers and mimeheader
only apply to mime headers.
body and rawbody afaik only search in bodies of messages or included
messages.
I have asked some time ago but no suc