Re: Untrustworthy TLDs and KAM

2022-05-02 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
Thanks Alex, definitely looks like a local score adjustment is best.   I would adjust the KAM rule score for the domains, possingly the PDS version as well, and your DKIMWL scores lower. In combination, they are definitely too weighty. Regards, KAM On 5/1/2022 10:42 PM, Alex wrote: On Sun,

Re: Untrustworthy TLDs and KAM

2022-05-02 Thread Benny Pedersen
On 2022-05-02 15:51, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: Thanks Alex, definitely looks like a local score adjustment is best.   I would adjust the KAM rule score for the domains, possingly the PDS version as well, and your DKIMWL scores lower. In combination, they are definitely too weighty. so why is kam

Re: Untrustworthy TLDs and KAM

2022-05-02 Thread Henrik K
On Sun, May 01, 2022 at 09:45:38PM -0400, Alex wrote: > Hi, > > Four points for a .online TLD with KAM rules > > * 2.0 PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD Untrustworthy TLDs > * [URI: www.lci-mtc.online (online)] > > * 2.0 KAM_SOMETLD_ARE_BAD_TLD .bar, .buzz, .cam, .casa, .cfd, .club, > * .date, .

Re: Untrustworthy TLDs and KAM

2022-05-02 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
Love it! Thanks Henrik. -- Kevin A. McGrail Member, Apache Software Foundation Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171 On Mon, May 2, 2022 at 12:31 PM Henrik K wrote: > On Sun, May 01, 2022 at 09:45:38PM -0400, Alex wrote: > > Hi, > > > >

Re: Another evil number

2022-05-02 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
Fascinating thread I just stumbled on. Yes, in early parts of the phone system, the letters were geographic and referenced the street for where the central office was located switching those calls.  For example, in Arlington VA, my grandfathers number was 533-9389 which was referred to as JE3-9