On 11/16/22 4:46 AM, Greg Troxel wrote:
Can you expand on that?
I'll try.
My understanding is that few MUAs test DKIM signatures /client/ /side/.
-- The only exception that I'm aware of is that there was a Thunderbird
add-on that would test DKIM signatures /client/ /side/. Almost all DKIM
Shawn Iverson skrev den 2022-11-14 21:14:
How do I stop this? paypal.com is in the default DKIM whitelist!
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=paypal.com; s=pp-dkim1;
c=relaxed/relaxed;
q=dns/txt; i=@paypal.com; t=1668452569;
h=From:From:Subject:Date:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
bh=o8/9XRPN
Greg Troxel writes:
> I did just get a bounce message in reply to a message I sent here,
> complaining that my message failed DKIM (maybe the list munged it) and
> SPF (ok; the list is not in general authorized to send mail from my
> domain) and therefore was being rejected (but I do not current
"Grant Taylor via users" writes:
> On 11/15/22 1:16 PM, Marc wrote:
>> Hmmm, good point, not really thought about this even. Are email
>> clients complaining about this?
>
> Few email clients are testing DKIM. Some servers are testing
> DKIM. Some systems are mis-treating DKIM failure as someth
