On Thu, 12 Jan 2023, John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jan 2023, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Wed, 2023-01-11 at 18:39 -0500, Joey J wrote:
Hello All,
I created this rule to check for email addresses matching a list to
get
added some negative value.
I also tried it with just domains so it wou
On Thu, 12 Jan 2023, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Wed, 2023-01-11 at 18:39 -0500, Joey J wrote:
Hello All,
I created this rule to check for email addresses matching a list to
get
added some negative value.
I also tried it with just domains so it would be more efficient, but I
can't seem to get th
There's no need for any rules:
whitelist_to us...@example.com
whitelist_to *@domain.com
And adjust USER_IN_WHITELIST_TO for score.
(welcomelist_to / USER_IN_WELCOMELIST_TO in 4.0)
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 04:56:21PM -0800, Loren Wilton wrote:
> ?
> Why not do a simple rule rather than inventi
On Wed, 2023-01-11 at 16:56 -0800, Loren Wilton wrote:
> Why not do a simple rule rather than inventing some Perl code?
>
> header TO_SPECIFIC_EMAIL To:addr ~=
> '(?:\bus...@example.com|\bus...@example.com|\bus...@example.com)'
> describe TO_SPECIFIC_EMAIL Mail to a specific email address
> score
On Wed, 2023-01-11 at 18:39 -0500, Joey J wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I created this rule to check for email addresses matching a list to
> get
> added some negative value.
> I also tried it with just domains so it would be more efficient, but I
> can't seem to get them to run.
> Any suggestions?
>
U
