On 13.02.23 17:42, joe a wrote:
Have some annoying SPAM that consistently shows a negative score on
BAYES. Is the default scoring or influenced by BAYES in some way?
*-1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
* [score: 0.]
This indicates a mistrained database, which mean
Have some annoying SPAM that consistently shows a negative score on BAYES.
Is the default scoring or influenced by BAYES in some way?
*-1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
* [score: 0.]
The score is reasonable for guaranteed ham, which is what your Bayes thinks
this
joe a skrev den 2023-02-14 00:12:
On 2/13/2023 5:51 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
joe a skrev den 2023-02-13 23:42:
Have some annoying SPAM that consistently shows a negative score on
BAYES. Is the default scoring or influenced by BAYES in some way?
*-1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is
On 2/13/2023 5:51 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
joe a skrev den 2023-02-13 23:42:
Have some annoying SPAM that consistently shows a negative score on
. . .
time to upgrade imho :=)
. . .
And, yes, I should upgrade.
On 2/13/2023 5:51 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
joe a skrev den 2023-02-13 23:42:
Have some annoying SPAM that consistently shows a negative score on
BAYES. Is the default scoring or influenced by BAYES in some way?
*-1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
* [score: 0.]
Spa
joe a skrev den 2023-02-13 23:42:
Have some annoying SPAM that consistently shows a negative score on
BAYES. Is the default scoring or influenced by BAYES in some way?
*-1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
* [score: 0.]
SpamAssassin 3.4.5
time to upgrade imho :=)
o
Have some annoying SPAM that consistently shows a negative score on
BAYES. Is the default scoring or influenced by BAYES in some way?
*-1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
* [score: 0.]
SpamAssassin 3.4.5
Thanks for any pointers.
