Testing meta rule

2005-12-20 Thread Casey King
Title: Testing meta rule I am requesting someone to please send me an email from the SA users list with a normal geocities conversation in the body of the message. I have created two rules, and I want to make sure all geocities emails are tagged as spam, while at the same time, allowing SA

RE: Testing meta rule

2005-12-20 Thread Casey King
: Testing meta rule On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 11:00:18AM -0600, Casey King wrote: have created two rules, and I want to make sure all geocities emails are tagged as spam, while at the same time, allowing SA users messages to be allowed without spam tagging. Why not just whitelist, or even better

Blacklist-uri.cf problem

2005-12-01 Thread Casey King
Title: Blacklist-uri.cf problem As of this morning (aproximately 6:30am up to now) all three of my systems have failed to update RDJ. This is what I am getting as an error. Rules Du Jour Run Summary:RulesDuJour Run Summary on wks-lin9: William Stearn's URI blacklist has changed on

RE: Blacklist-uri.cf problem

2005-12-01 Thread Casey King
I will definitely do this, but what happens when the update comes in tomorrow...will this be fixed by then? -Original Message- From: John Narron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 11:15 AM To: 'Casey King'; users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: RE: Blacklist

RE: Blacklist-uri.cf problem

2005-12-01 Thread Casey King
. -Original Message- From: John Narron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 11:29 AM To: 'Casey King'; users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: RE: Blacklist-uri.cf problem Dunno, I don't maintain it, just providing a workaround until it can be properly fixed

Recurring abuser

2005-12-01 Thread Casey King
Title: Recurring abuser My MailScanner boxes are still getting drilled with the Sober.Virus and spam (none which have made it through) from a single IP address. I did a lookup on dnsstuff.com for the address {66.243.13.178} but made no headway on what to do about this. What steps do I need

RE: Rule for this

2005-11-22 Thread Casey King
Title: Message I do understand that the trusted hosts needs to be fixed, but not being fully in control, I am not allowed to do this. I have had this discussion with the Senior Admin. I am running SA 3.1, and yes I do have an antidrug rule in place. I am currently looking for a more up to

RE: New Spammer?

2005-11-22 Thread Casey King
be considered a novice, much like what you and Julian have been discussing on the MailScanner list. Casey -Original Message- From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 9:47 AM To: Casey King; SpamAssassin Users Subject: Re: New Spammer? At 09:56 AM 11/22/2005

RE: Rule for this

2005-11-18 Thread Casey King
this? -Original Message- From: Jean-Paul Natola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 2:50 PM To: Gene Heskett; users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: RE: Rule for this ??-LINT On Monday 14 November 2005 11:22, Casey King wrote: Okay, I have the rule in my local.cf as body

RE: Rule for this ??

2005-11-14 Thread Casey King
This rule goes in the local.cf file right? I added this rule, and restarted MailScanner and it does not seem to be reading the rule. I am not so good with writing rules, but I was wondering Body L_DRUGS11 Score L_DRUGS1 Are these supposed to be set this way, or do these both need to be set

RE: Rule for this ??

2005-11-14 Thread Casey King
length 0.69SARE_SPEC_LEO_LINE06 5.00SARE_URI_EQUALS Trying to hide the real URL with IE parsing bug 0.00UPPERCASE_25_50 message body is 25-50% uppercase -Original Message- From: Pierre Thomson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 9:19 AM To: Casey King

RE: Spamd / RDJ

2005-10-06 Thread Casey King
: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 5:21 PM To: Chris Thielen Cc: SpamAssassin Users; Casey King Subject: Re: Spamd / RDJ Chris Thielen wrote: Hi Casey, Larry and Dhawal are correct, you shouldn't be restarting spamd if you don't use it (spamassassin --lint does NOT require spamd). I recommend changing

Spamd / RDJ

2005-10-05 Thread Casey King
Because RDJ lints SA, I have tried to create a cron job that would stop Spamd from running. I do not want it using up so much memory since MailScanner calls SA on its own. My crontab looks like this: - SHELL=/bin/bash PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin

RDJ Blacklist

2005-09-29 Thread Casey King
While checking RDJ on my systems. I noticed, blacklist-uri last updated on 9.21.2005 on two of my systems, and on my third system, it is current as of today. The version of RDJ I am running on all three systems is 1.21. I know there is a 1.24, but I would like to get this working again

RE: RDJ Blacklist

2005-09-29 Thread Casey King
downloading the current version of blacklist-uri.cf -Original Message- From: Casey King [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 9:29 AM To: SpamAssassin Users Subject: RDJ Blacklist While checking RDJ on my systems. I noticed, blacklist-uri last updated on 9.21.2005

RE: AutoWhiteList

2005-08-10 Thread Casey King
Since waiting for a reply concerning my issue, I pulled the src.rpm off the CD. 3.0.1 and installed it, and still the same problemwhy is my auto-whitelist file(s) not showing up? -Original Message- From: Casey King [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 3:15 PM

AutoWhiteList

2005-08-09 Thread Casey King
I seem to be at a loss. I have installed SA 3.0.4 on two identical machines. Both machines are running CentOS4.1. Other software loaded would include: Sendmail 8-13.4-1 (from src rpm) Clamav 0-86 (tar file) MailScanner 4.44.1-1 (tar) MailWatch 1.0.1 (tar) phpMyAdmin 2.6.3-pl1 (tar) Webmin