Re: Phishing attempts getting through.

And this has what to do with Spamassassin? Sunny Forro wrote: Hello, I've got a problem. I've got a lot of phishing attacks making it through my mailscanner setup. I do have phishing fraud detection turned on, and I have not modifed the phishing safe sites list. Most(if not all) of the phi

Re: feeding bayes

Thanks. Glad I havn't started feeding it yet. So what I need to do is look at the attachments and then save then to a file then train on that. correct? That makes sense. Maybe that is why my old SA instance got kinda weird in the end. Thanks Matt Kettler wrote: Well, first, if you aren't stripp

feeding bayes

I just noticed that some of my users are attaching multiple spams in one email to my "spam" user for training. Aside from having to have 200 spam/ham mails and the possibiliy of the messages being too large, would this have an effect on training? Thanks. -- Michael H. Collins Admiral, Penguin

Re: maybe OT mail being rejected.

Thanks. The issue resolved itself in about 30 minutes. I assume something was just fubar on their end. Matt Kettler wrote: At 03:50 PM 2/11/2005, ChupaCabra wrote: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host mail.americanadvisor.net[199.231.136.136] said: 501 5.7.1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Sende

maybe OT mail being rejected.

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host mail.americanadvisor.net[199.231.136.136] said: 501 5.7.1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... Sender refused by the DNSBL cbl.abuseat.org (in reply to MAIL FROM command) Does this mean I am on some kind of bad list? I am choiceinv If I am on some list how do I get off. We rece

Maybe SA can be of use here.

I took over this email server late in 2003. According to the nasd a copy of all broker emails must be kept. At first we were using mbox and now we use Maildir. One user has a copy of all email including "[SPAM]" mails. We have discussed it and want to remove all the mail marked as [SPAM] and

Re: maintaining the 2.6 branch

I was sticking with 2.64 and postfix 1.* for those same reasons My /boot got totally hosed on my server so I was forced to begin using my experimental box with PF2 and SA302. Now at least half of the spam that used to be processed by SA never even gets there as PF rejects it outright. I am usi

Re: annoying changes in 3.0

Ya, I don't get the whole thread. If one wants seamless upgrades and backwards compat for 10 years one should stick to windows, Solaris, AIX etc. Ya, right. My 1 cent for the week. Stuart Johnston wrote: Dan Hollis wrote: On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, Matt Kettler wrote: With over 68% market share, a

Re: OT Boincing Spam

d anything suitable. Lets hope this collection of emails appeases him some. Thanks. Chris Santerre wrote: -Original Message----- From: ChupaCabra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] First he wanted that. I did it but actually kept em all. So then his partner didn't get an urgent email so it was turn

Re: OT Boincing Spam

shane mullins wrote: Could you just discard it? I was till a couple of vips lost important email. I was actually keeping it all because I knew better.

Re: OT Boincing Spam

Evan Platt wrote: Evan Platt said: I don't have a link for you, but tell your boss to imagine if someone decided to dictionary attack every ISP they could find, using not only dictionary words, but every combination of letters up to 9 letters, i.e. a, b, c, etc up to zzz

OT Boincing Spam

My boss is twisting off today because he got 350 messages marked [SPAM] over the weekend. His Reaction is to "Bounce em all, Let the isps sort it out." I tried explaining about forged headers and the myriad of other methods spammers use to look like they come from someplace else. Apparantly

OT found this and thought of y'all

http://scoot.net/gallery/bbs/1823137550.jpg -- Michael H. Collins Admiral, Penguinista Navy http://linuxlink.com /"\ASCII Ribbon Campaign \ / No HTML/RTF in email x No Word docs in email / \ Respect for open standards Take your laptop and yell out: "Can a brother get a ip ad

Re: kinda OT procmailrc

I took the trailing slash off and it was just chunking my mail into the Maildir. Not in tmp, new or current. The users didn't like that and then I had to go put them in the right spot. :-) The \[SPAM\] escapes worked wonders though. Bob Proulx wrote: You need to understand that Maildir forma

Re: kinda OT procmailrc

Bob Proulx wrote: ChupaCabra wrote: Is it not kosher to have both a /etc/procmailrc and a $USER/.procmailrc That is okay. But I think your problem is that you have set both DEFAULT and MAILDIR to the same location. here is my /etc/procmailrc VERBOSE=yes MAILDIR=$HOME/Maildir/ DEFAULT

kinda OT procmailrc

Is it not kosher to have both a /etc/procmailrc and a $USER/.procmailrc here is my /etc/procmailrc VERBOSE=yes MAILDIR=$HOME/Maildir/ DEFAULT=$HOME/Maildir/ LOGFILE=/var/log/procmaillog DROPPRIVS=yes COMSAT=no :0fw * < 256000 | spamc # All mail tagged as spam (eg. with a score higher than the

Re: OT: Ninja Blanket

Kenneth Porter wrote: Was browsing ThinkGeek just now (looking for the Swiss Army USB memory fob) and noticed they have a "Ninja Blanket" on the home page: I, for one, miss the ninjas on the SA website. -- Michael H. Collins Admiral, Penguin