es that allows SPAM though is a bad way to enforce
> policy.
It sounds like they've tried other options but didn't get a response from
abusive users so this is the 'last resort' option.
--
Daniel J. Luke
due
> to a difference in the way it handled duplicate keys compared with the
> database that normally supports it.
>
> Martin
>
--
Daniel J. Luke
vice. The first hints were those counters increasing at the same time as the
mysterious issue happening.
--
Daniel J. Luke
On Sep 8, 2018, at 8:48 PM, Sidney Markowitz wrote:
> Macports install of db48 should work for that, but I haven't tried it.
I use this (with a perl I built myself outside of macports) and I can confirm
it works.
--
Daniel J. Luke
f)
another 'easy' test I would try would be to set numcpus in runGA to 1 just in
case the problem is that somewhere there are multiple writers overwriting parts
of the same file
--
Daniel J. Luke
the SA server now but it contains a lot of
> files. I need to find the large dirs and exclude them.
--
Daniel J. Luke
s like it's building a
version of SpamAssassin from trunk svn? maybe you are referring to something
else?)
--
Daniel J. Luke
On Jun 3, 2016, at 12:51 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
>> if the first hop in dns is 127.0.0.1 it works
>
> that's not how +trace works
oh, nevermind - you are right. It will query for the root servers from your
configured resolvers.
--
Daniel J. Luke
onf only have one single line with nameserver
> 127.0.0.1 nothing more nothing less
good advise.
> drop unbound if it cant make it right, replace it with bind9
either works fine if configured correctly (and not so well if configured
incorrectly).
--
Daniel J. Luke
-effective anti-spam
measure I ever took (I had to stop using it to outright reject mail because of
too many false positives, though).
--
Daniel J. Luke
ikely experience
delivery problems to many hosts as long as your dns or rdns 'looks like' a
dynamic system.
While you are at it, make sure your forward and reverse dns match.
--
Daniel J. Luke
On Mar 29, 2016, at 10:41 AM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
> On Mar 28, 2016, at 8:57 PM, Bill Cole
> wrote:
>> On 28 Mar 2016, at 14:42, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
>>> On Mar 24, 2016, at 12:10 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
>>>> /usr/bin/time spamassassin < spam.msg
&
On Mar 28, 2016, at 8:57 PM, Bill Cole
wrote:
> On 28 Mar 2016, at 14:42, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
>> On Mar 24, 2016, at 12:10 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
>>> /usr/bin/time spamassassin < spam.msg
>>> 7.92 real 1.85 user 0.13 sys
>>&g
On Mar 24, 2016, at 12:10 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
> /usr/bin/time spamassassin < spam.msg
>7.92 real 1.85 user 0.13 sys
>
> /usr/bin/time spamc -U /var/run/spamd.sock < spam.msg
> 126.44 real 0.00 user 0.00 sys
well, it looks
but I'm not sure why that would be / where I
should look next to troubleshoot and fix.
--
Daniel J. Luke
15 matches
Mail list logo
