> On Apr 11, 2024, at 5:51 PM, Darrell Budic wrote:
>
> On Apr 11, 2024, at 3:30 PM, Bill Cole
> wrote:
>>
>> On 2024-04-10 at 21:19:48 UTC-0400 (Wed, 10 Apr 2024 20:19:48 -0500)
>> Darrell Budic mailto:bu...@onholyground.com>>
>> is rumored to ha
On Apr 11, 2024, at 3:30 PM, Bill Cole
wrote:
>
> On 2024-04-10 at 21:19:48 UTC-0400 (Wed, 10 Apr 2024 20:19:48 -0500)
> Darrell Budic mailto:bu...@onholyground.com>>
> is rumored to have said:
>
>>> On Apr 10, 2024, at 2:52 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>>&g
> On Apr 10, 2024, at 2:52 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
> Darrell Budic skrev den 2024-04-10 19:48:
>
>> Anything I’m missing?
>
> using amavisd ?
>
> then try this in amavisd.conf:
>
>
> @spam_scanners = (
># ['SpamAssassin', 'Amavis::SpamC
> On Apr 10, 2024, at 1:30 PM, Bill Cole
> wrote:
>
> On 2024-04-10 at 13:48:47 UTC-0400 (Wed, 10 Apr 2024 12:48:47 -0500)
> Darrell Budic mailto:bu...@onholyground.com>>
> is rumored to have said:
>
>> Just checking in here that I’m not doing something wrong
Just checking in here that I’m not doing something wrong with the ASN plugin
before I file a bug on this. SpamAssassin 4.0.1 installed from cpan on Alma 9.
I’ve got it configured to use the local maxmind db files, and those show up in
logs. Testing in spamassassin itself show that it finds the
I’ve had it running against a mariadb galera setup for a few years now. Have
not experienced any issues here. Did not have to take any special actions on
SpamAssassins side, just pointed it at a dns round robin entry for the backend
servers and setup appropriate access perms for them.
> On Jul 20, 2021, at 10:16 AM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>
> On 7/19/2021 12:48 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> On 19.07.21 10:43, Jared Hall wrote:
>>> CHAOS.pm: Callouts, Handlers, And Other Stuff
>>>
>>> https://github.com/telecom2k3/CHAOS
>>>
>>>
>>>
> On Nov 12, 2020, at 1:01 PM, RW wrote:
>
> On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 11:23:29 -0600
> Darrell Budic wrote:
>
>> Got a few of these 411 google form spams recently and was wondering
>> why they weren’t getting caught by SA. Looks like the Return-Path: is
>> triggeri
On Nov 12, 2020, at 12:31 PM, John Hardin wrote:
>
> On Thu, 12 Nov 2020, Darrell Budic wrote:
>
>> On Nov 12, 2020, at 11:54 AM, John Hardin wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, 12 Nov 2020, Darrell Budic wrote:
>>>
>>>> Got a few of thes
On Nov 12, 2020, at 11:54 AM, John Hardin wrote:
>
> On Thu, 12 Nov 2020, Darrell Budic wrote:
>
>> Got a few of these 411 google form spams recently and was wondering why they
>> weren’t getting caught by SA. Looks like the Return-Path: is triggering a
>> whit
Got a few of these 411 google form spams recently and was wondering why they
weren’t getting caught by SA. Looks like the Return-Path: is triggering a
whitelist rule on google.com so the rest of the tests aren’t enough to get it
tagged. Anything I can do to keep the whitelist rule from firing
> On Sep 23, 2020, at 2:52 PM, Jerry Malcolm wrote:
>
>
> On 9/23/2020 2:38 PM, Grant Taylor wrote:
>> On 9/23/20 1:22 PM, Jerry Malcolm wrote:
>>> With all of the gyrations I had to go through to be able to use SES along
>>> the monitoring Amazon does with SES, I'm kinda surprised that it
12 matches
Mail list logo