RE: score=100.0 required=3.0 tests=SHORTCIRCUIT,,USER_IN_BLACKLIST

2011-01-27 Thread Florescu, Dan Alexandru
Fire up what? Correct me if I'm wrong, but as far as I know SA does not reject at SMTP session level. I myself am using it with amavis and I have: $sa_quarantine_cutoff_level = 12.0; which will drop any spammy message with that score or above it. If you don't have any option you can use header_ch

null score for hits

2010-12-09 Thread Florescu, Dan Alexandru
Hi, I just upgraded to SA 3.3.1. Installed the rules using sa-update => ls /var/lib/spamassassin/ 3.003001 And I fed a message to SA using spamassassin -t < msg1. It gave me the following: Spam detection software, running on the system "xxxhost.tld", has identified this incoming email as possible

RE: spam with different "Received" and "To" headers

2010-12-07 Thread Florescu, Dan Alexandru
good link: http://www.owlriver.com/spam/stop-spam.html -Original Message- From: Daniel McDonald [] Sent: Tuesday 07, December 12, 2010 16:46 To: spamassassin Subject: Re: spam with different "Received" and "To" headers On 12/7/10 8:20 AM, "Florescu, Dan Ale

spam with different "Received" and "To" headers

2010-12-07 Thread Florescu, Dan Alexandru
Hi, In the last few days some spam messages have been able to elude the filters I use. Upon checking the headers, it seems to be following the same pattern. Left only a few headers to exemplify: - Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx.company.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BC