it reduced significantly SPAM?
I'd like to know if it's worth the (little) trouble of setup and
verifying question #1.
Thank you for your time.
--
Francesco Abeni
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel. 328 317 85 48
skype f.abeni
Tarak Ranjan ha scritto:
Hi List,
how do i come to know that each and every incoming
outgoing mail is
massing through SA.
What about looking at the full headers of the received message? This
seems to me the quickest way. This is a little different depending on
your mail client, but once
Thomas Raef ha scritto:
(...) I'd like to implement a Bogus MX for further filtering of
SPAM. I don't know if this is the correct name, by Bogus MX i
mean setting up a low priority MX record which points at a non-smtp
server.
I'd like to know some first-hand experience about two questions.
Bowie Bailey ha scritto:
Francesco Abeni wrote:
(...) I'd like to implement a Bogus MX ...
I would say that it is too risky to put a non-smtp host as your primary
MX. There are some servers which will have a problem with that setup
and either be unable to deliver mail to you or delay
of a tool that can give me this rules
usage on a folder of messages?
--
Francesco Abeni
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel. 328 317 85 48
skype f.abeni
