On Mon, 7 Aug 2006, Sietse van Zanen wrote:
OK than let's put this in another 'political' context:
Caring about 'legitimate' e-mail coming from those domains would be like
caring for the few 'legitimate' bombs dropped over Iraq, Afghanistan or
Lebanon.
It would indeed be better to have no
Hello!
It may be a strange request, but i need to collect spam for a research
project about the way spammers attack and the way they bypass the antispam
filters.
Obviously, for this project i need to collect spam in different ways and on
different types. Also, my project can be concludent only
Find a floppy disk. Format it. Move cpanel over to the floppy disk.
Remove the floppy disk from the system. Wrap the floppy in alternating
layers of foil, lead is best, and parafin until it is about 6 thick.
Save it until the next full Moon. Take it to a graveyard. In a quiet
corner dig a hole
I even lowered the required hits to 4.0 from 5.0.
for example, the latest batch of spams with your resume in the
subject:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_50,FORGED_RCVD_HELO,
HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY autolearn=no
version=3.1.3
and
Hi all,
Bayes seems to be missing quite a lot of spam. I'm getting these
results quite often:
snip
Email:63252 Autolearn: 26740 AvgScore: 14.53 AvgScanTime: 1.69 sec
Spam: 51232 Autolearn: 23252 AvgScore: 21.08 AvgScanTime: 1.68 sec
Ham: 12020 Autolearn: 3488
Do any of you out there run spamassassin on a mail relay or pop/imap
server to add the X-Spam headers to all mail that passes through your
gateway?
Yep, border MX servers which accept all mail for all domains we host, scan
all the mail, then pass it along the line to the recipient servers.
#!/bin/sh
cd mail/Lists
for x in `ls`
do
sa-learn --ham --mbox $x
done
-Gary
On Fri, 2 Jun 2006, Kenneth Porter wrote:
On Friday, June 02, 2006 9:47 PM -0400 JamesDR [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
How many messages have you trained? You'll need 200 each to get it going,
and I recommend
Gary, doesn't that presuppose that the mail/lists directory does not
contain a spam list?
Yep, but his original e-mail said mail/Lists was for ham training, nothing
about spam, so that's why I put that in there. It really was a quick and
dirty answer, and in his other reply, there's more
Thanks, that handles the top level. ;)
Yeah, it was quick and simple for just the one scenario you had in your
e-mail.
Me, I redirect mail using a combo of procmail and Postfix header checks to
2 users on the border servers (hamfilter and spamfilter), then I do 2
nightly script runs to
2. Is there a way I can put the razor-agent.log into multilog? If not,
how do I rotate this log file?
For myself on FreeBSD, I installed by source, not by port, so adjust your
configs as necessary, but I use the newsyslog facility (/etc/newsyslog) to
rotate the log files with the nightly
Attached is what I use, found it on a webpage about installing SA when I
was going through it. Customized slightly for my local usernames and ways
of doing things.
When spamd dies, all mail continues to come through, it just doesn't get
analyzed by SA until spamd gets restarted.
Here's my
On Thu, 6 Apr 2006, Patrick Sherrill wrote:
What is the best way to send spam candidates from Outlook and Outlook Express
to spamassassin for learning?
Here, I have a generic spam address on my border servers running SA.
For the users, I have them set up a rule to send tagged spam to that
On Thu, 6 Apr 2006, Gustafson, Tim wrote:
I have been using FreeBSD in a production environment for almost 10
years now (since version 2.2.5!) and have absolutely NO complaints about
it. I've regularly had servers with uptimes in excess of 6 months, and
even those were just rebooted for kernel
(sorry for the top-post)
Ryan,
I use SA with Postfix on FreeBSD in a border MX gateway solution for our
customers, which would serve your store and forward requirement to 3
geographic locations, with some nightly scripts to do auto-learning. The
border servers accept all mail for our
14 matches
Mail list logo
