On 7/21/23 9:10 AM, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
Hi,
phishstats[.]info domain has recently moved to a parking domain, if
you are using Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Phishing plugin with data
downloaded from PhishStats[.]info it would be better to comment
"phishing_phishstats_feed" configuration line.
Greetings,
What is the purpose of the rule named T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE? On my
servers, it hits nearly every spam and ham email.
Regards,
Larry
On 5/29/19 7:32 AM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
That's a non-scoring sub-rule, setting its score to 0 has no effect.
Redefining the rule to disable it is the way to go:
meta __STYLE_GIBBERISH_1 0
FWIW, I've added this to local.cf, recompiled, and restarted spamd but
am still seeing CPUs
On 7/20/17 2:31 AM, Henrik K wrote:
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 01:02:07AM -0500, David B Funk wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jul 2017, Andrzej A. Filip wrote:
By default messages bigger than 500KB are not sent to spamd for
processing/scanning => the tactics you describe frequently "turns off"
spam filtering.
Oops! Sorry, I didn't intend to send my previous message to the list.
Nedry
On 9/29/09 at 12:51 PM -0500 Larry Nedry wrote:
On 9/29/09 at 7:41 AM -0700 Marc Perkel wrote:
For those of you getting spam from IPs/Hostnames on my hostkarma white
list, if you could email me a list of false hits (IP
On 5/22/09 at 9:28 PM +0200 Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
An interesting observation is, that the hitrate (in percent) in spam
scoring 15 is an order of magnitude higher than with high-scoring [1]
spam. This is rare to find...
My EMAILBL_TEST_LEM hitrate leans heavily toward the other end of the
On 4/16/09 at 7:44 AM -0400 Michael Scheidell wrote:
Larry: what version of re2c are you using?
re2c 0.13.5
On 4/15/09 at 10:30 AM -0400 Rick Macdougall wrote:
Normal sa-update sa-compile takes about 2 minutes here.
If I add JM's saught rules it takes over 30 minutes.
Here's another data point. With JM's sought and sought-fraud rules the
compile takes less than 7 minutes on a server running an Intel
On 2/10/09 at 8:38 PM +0100 Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
I don't see a problem to do this. Really wonder why that machine dos not
have Internet access, though. Not to be snarky either, but I'd be
interested in the answer to John's question, too. ;)
I can't speak for Daniel but I have an offline
On 1/18/09 at 3:46 PM -0500 Munroe Sollog wrote:
I am sure this has been asked before, however, I cannot find any clear
documentation nor archives addressing this question. I would like to
store a per domain bayesdb, preferably in a database. Is there
documentation on doing this?
Yes, it is
On 9/4/08 at 9:10 AM -0400 Michael Scheidell wrote:
Anyone else missing the DKIM_VERIFIED rule on legit email?
Out of the last 249,000 emails, DKIM_VERIFIED has only hit 18 times.
DKIM_SIGNED on the other hand has hit about 58,000 times.
Nedry
On 3/21/08 at 4:59 PM +0200 Henrik K wrote:
Hehe, yeah it should be ok. Let me know if you spot any false FPs with
REPLYTO..
I recently installed the FreeMail 1.10 SA plugin and am getting a
ridiculous number of FPs. I haven't installed Regexp::Assemble but that
shouldn't make any difference in
On 8/15/08 at 8:07 AM -0700 John Hardin wrote:
Is there any reason the base rules should _not_ contain a
whitelist_from_spf or whitelist_from_rcvd for the list?
Would you really want to auto-train your bayes with mail from this list?
Nedry
On 8/4/08 at 8:42 PM -0500 Chris wrote:
Hi Dirk, I've been using it on my home system probably ever since you made it
available. Below are hit stats from yesterday:
Total: 279
Ham: 122
Spam: 157
iXhash.cf:
Rule Name Score Ham Spam %of Ham %of Spam
On 7/27/08 at 8:28 AM -0700 jdow wrote:
These are important results. They show that you have a plenty fast
enough machine for 100,000 emails per day, although given the fact
that daytime is pretty bad compared to night time you'd probably see
significant slowdowns in throughput during the day as
On 6/26/08 at 7:05 PM +0200 Benny Pedersen wrote:
make priority positive not negative, default all have 0 to start with, and
10 would be tested before 0 :-)
And again on 6/26/08 at 10:06 PM +0200 Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Thu, June 26, 2008 21:17, Michael Parker wrote:
Negative numbers come
On 6/7/08 at 3:19 PM -0500 Larry Nedry wrote:
Hi All,
A few days ago whitelist_auth and whitelist_from_dkim stopped working.
Everything else seems to be working well. I haven't made any changes to
the server recently so I find this puzzling.
neither of these rules work:
whitelist_from_dkim
On 6/7/08 at 3:19 PM Larry Nedry wrote:
Hi All,
A few days ago whitelist_auth and whitelist_from_dkim stopped working.
Everything else seems to be working well. I haven't made any changes to
the server recently so I find this puzzling.
neither of these rules work:
whitelist_from_dkim
On 6/8/08 at 10:41 AM +0200 Matus UHLAR wrote:
didn't you upgrade any packages?
No, I haven't made any changes to the server in recent weeks.
Didn't example.com stop publishing domainkeys records?
No, none of the domains that I have whitelisted have stopped publishing
DomainKeys, SPF or DKIM
Hi All,
A few days ago whitelist_auth and whitelist_from_dkim stopped working.
Everything else seems to be working well. I haven't made any changes to
the server recently so I find this puzzling.
neither of these rules work:
whitelist_from_dkim[EMAIL PROTECTED]
whitelist_auth
Greetings,
This weekend I created a MySQL db to store my bayes tokens. It seems to be
working well but I'm a little puzzled by the default size of
bayes_expiry_max_db_size. I understand that the default size is 150,000
which seems very low as it took only one day to reach 100,000 tokens.
Was
On 5/27/08 at 4:33 PM -0500 Michael Parker wrote:
You should adjust it for whatever works best for your user base and
the resources you have available on your database.
Of course. But how would I figure out what works best? How can I tell if
it is working poorly or very well?
I'm looking for a
On 3/20/08 at 7:36 AM -0400 Michael Scheidell wrote:
So, godaddy, you use SpamAssassin?
I found out the hard way that Godaddy doe use SpamAssassin to scan
customers' outgoing mail. Up until late last year I was renting a
dedicated server from them. Suddenly one day most of the mail sent by my
I've been using Justin Mason's auto-generated rule set since mid October
and am fairly happy with it. Up until Jan 11, false positives averaged
about 10% of the hits and I can live with that.
I noticed a surprising change on Jan 11, 2008. Before that day many of the
hits were on low scoring (
On 1/31/08 at 10:38 AM + Justin Mason wrote:
Is anyone using mass-check without previously having SVN set up?
Yes, I am. I don't know what's involved in using SVN but I did look at the
SVN tree via the web and at first and second look, it wasn't obvious how to
use the web to easily download
On 1/30/08 at 12:12 PM -0500 Theo Van Dinter wrote:
So the masses directory was cut, since the only time you'd use that stuff is
when developing SA or rules, and at that point you can just grab the SVN
tree since you're probably going to want to use it for the latest code/rules
anyway.
I imagine
On 1/30/08 at 3:20 PM + Arthur Dent wrote:
I am so pleased with this rule that I decided to give my poor old SA a
well-deserved rest from this rubbish and take these spams out at Procmail
time.
Keep in mind that there are a lot of mobile phones out there that have
email addresses that begin
On 10/19/07 at 10:55 AM +0100 Justin Mason wrote:
I think you need 3.2.x for the MIMEHeader plugin.
Nope, the Storm MP3 rules work just fine with SA 3.1.8.
Nedry
On 8/13/07 at 4:01 PM +0100 Justin Mason wrote:
I've been working on a new way to auto-generate body rules recently...
Are these rules restricted to Spamassassin 3.2 or newer?
The following is what I get when I dig 8.1.3.sought.rules.yerp.org. Notice
the NXDOMAIN.
Thanks for the great work!
On 4/6/07 Josh Graham wrote:
Last year there was this page I had bookmarked that was basically a php
form where you enter criteria and it would output Spamassassin rules for
you.
SpamAssassin Configuration Generator
http://www.yrex.com/spam/spamconfig.php
HTH,
Nedry
On 4/4/07 at 10:40 AM +0100 Justin Mason wrote:
Could you try adding --restart=1000?
In 3.1.18 mass-check will hang at the point where it should restart.
Also, could you try with the rc1 of SpamAssassin 3.2.0, or SVN trunk?
I think Theo fixed bugs in this code.
Thanks, I downloaded the lastest
Hi All,
I'm trying to use mass-check to test the accuracy of a plugin that I'm
developing. If I run mass-check without the -j option (single process) it
takes a few hours for it to finish a corpus of about 60,000 emails. If I
use the --net option it could a day or two to complete. Of course if
On 2/6/07 at 12:31 PM + Steve [Spamassassin] wrote:
I'm being Joe-Jobbed by some spamming kit that seems to be used fairly
widely... or, at least, from a wide range of hosts.
Snipped
Are there any existing plug-ins for Spamassassin which address this kind
of problem?
VBounce
On 12/29/06 at 12:09 PM -0500 Vernon Webb wrote:
Yes, ORDB-RBL SBL+XBL
FWIW, relays.ordb.org no longer exists:
http://ordb.org/news/?id=38
Nedry
Hello again,
On 12/28/06 at 10:51 AM -0600 Larry Nedry wrote:
I am administering a linux box that has the Plesk 8.1 control panel
installed. SpamAssassin 3.0.4 comes with the Plesk package and it doesn't
look like it would be easy to upgrade to the latest version of SA.
I want to install
On 12/29/06 at 2:50 PM -0500 Vernon Webb wrote:
What are you using?
Currently I am using only zen.spamhaus.org. The rest of the RBLs that I
have tried have had too many false positives to be useful for my
requirements.
Which RBLs do the rest of you folks feel comfortable using?
Nedry
Hello All,
I am administering a linux box that has the Plesk 8.1 control panel
installed. SpamAssassin 3.0.4 comes with the Plesk package and it doesn't
look like it would be easy to upgrade to the latest version of SA.
I want to install VBounce which requires Mail::SpamAssassin::Logger. It
37 matches
Mail list logo
