Don't see this on a web site any where..the URL works but there's
mention/documentation of if I can find.
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> -Original Message-
> From: Yet Another Ninja [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 01 November 20
Hi
Put in an ACL for local machines so that you don't run SA for these people.
Either that or if users are remote (ie you're an ISP) do authententication then
use that for the ACL check.
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> -Original Mess
Dave
I got mine in seconds this morning.
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Koontz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 22 September 2008 15:30
> To: Justin Piszcz
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Sub
Hi
You'll probably get a lot of this, but a lot the software you mention is really
really old, and I'm surprised you're clamav is indeed getting it's regular
updates.
Also a lot of people will recommend NOT using a fast moving linux distribution
like Fedora as server.
Once you've upgraded spa
Hi
/usr/share/spamassassin - contains version release time rules, always used
unless next dir exists.
/var/lib/spamassassin// - contains 'sa-update'ed rules to bring
release time rules upto date without needing a full version release
/etc/mail/spamassassin - contains site wide rules and set
Sorry, the feature of not SA scanning if the message is 'large'.
--
martin
-Original Message-
From: mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 8:25 PM
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Skip scanning for large mails
Martin.Hepworth wrote:
Depends on you call SA.. Mailscanner for one has this feature.
martin
-Original Message-
From: mouss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 6:42 PM
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Skip scanning for large mails
RobertH wrote:
>> From: mouss >
>>
>> 1MB is p
I find i have to run botnet rules individually, not as the big meta rule. See
the doc in the tar ball for how to.
-- martin
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Stroik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 10:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subjec
Rob
Can't say i have, but SA does need someone with a little expertise and a clue
(tm) to get it going well. After that it takes very little extra work apart
from upgrading every so often and running sa-update every week or so.
--
martin
-Original Message-
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
S
Hi normally this is a timeout issue, check your dns (local caching dns on the
spamd server helps alot) andake you are not running all rbls as this can take
along time.
--
martin
-Original Message-
From: ersteller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2008 6:35 PM
To: users@sp
David
3.1.8 is fairly old, doesn't surprise me there's no updates.
--
martin
-Original Message-
From: David Carvalho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 6:13 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: sa-update no new rules ?
Hi !
I'm using spamassassin 3.1.8 on a
Marc
So what happens if you run a local nameserver in caching mode? You may find
this reduces the DNS related query time (and for that matter overall SA
processing) dramitcally).
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> -Original Message-
Theres quite a few docs about sa-learning and imap email boxes.
Doesn't matter whetr it's remote or local in this scenario.
--
martin
-Original Message-
From: Thiago Henrique <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 5:57 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Sa-learn
Patrick
Yes RDJ will still work, but only for the ones you've enabled. There's been
very liitle update on the standard RDJ ruleset for months now. So don't expect
to see much updating.
Sa-update is the way to go for more modern versiosn, this will also keep the
core rules updated too.
--
Mar
Steve
Home page is//
http://people.ucsc.edu/~jrudd/spamassassin/
Latest is 0.8
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> -Original Message-
> From: Steven Stern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 04 August 2008 21:13
> To: users@spamassass
Ron
I'd check what RBL's and URI-RBL's you are running.
If you haven't turned any of them then you're running them all - which can lead
to very long processing times.
Choose one or two you want by looking through the 20_dnsbl_tests.cf file. And
give then rest a zero score in local.cf
Running
Hi
That's because you've put 'from [EMAIL PROTECTED]' in the whitelist.
This is a bad idea as you've found out, as spammers almost always fake the from
address.
I find it's best not to call SA when the email if from trusted IP-Addresses not
email addresses, esp for my local domain. Depends on
Simone
This is more a mailscanner issue - try asking there..
The spamassassin is timing out. What RBL's are you running in spamassassin?
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> -Original Message-
> From: Simone Morandini [mailto:[EMAIL PR
Yeah the whay you get a phone call once a month to the help desk when a single
piece of spam ends up in users inbox ;-)
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> -Original Message-
> From: NGSS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 20 June 2008
Henry
Make sure the spam/ham folders are imap folders. Make sure they drag the
messages into that folder and not email them as it'll muck up the headers
otherwise.
Then grab a perl script (heck here's one below) to get messages from those
folders and place into the bayes.
Make sure you're run
Greg
Never found awl much good in a multi-user setup. Seems very variable - works
For some, not for others.
I get wayoo many false negatives with it as the spammers use the same 'from'
quite a few times, so the address makes it io the awl db.
Ymmv as they say.
--
martin
-Original Messag
You can do this with an "incestuous" call to exim. Make this your first
router:
split:
driver = accept
domains = the.domains.you.want.to.do.this.for
condition = ${if eq {$received_protocol}{split}{no}{yes}}
transport = send_to_self
no_verify
Add this transport:
send_to_self:
dr
Paolo
Upgrade to latest 3.2.4, run sa-update and see if this makes any difference.
There where a couple of nasty buglets in 3.2.3 that could slow the whole the
thing down.
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> -Original Message-
> From
All
We've been using the following pyzor server..
82.94.255.100:24441
For many years now as the 'official' one seemed not to update.
Now this this seems to be dead as well (well people on the MailScanner IRC
channel also report no activity from this).
Any news or good alternates?
--
Martin H
Thomas
Check you've done an sa-update after you installed 3.2.3.
There's a nasty bug with completewhois lookups in the default 3.2.3. Running
sa-update turns off those rules. If you want those rules working then install
the patch found in bug id 5589. But easiest 'fix' is run sa-update ;-)
--
gt; Subject: RE: How to catch these?
>
> Martin.Hepworth wrote:
>
> > 2.3 MANGLED_VIDEO BODY: mangled video(s)
> >
> > The MANGLED_VIDEO is from one of Jennifier's rules on
> > http://www.rulesemporium.com/other-rules.htm - guess which one ;-)
Matthias
My system on 3.1.8 scores this..
Content analysis details: (7.1 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
-- --
0.5 HELO_EQ_LOCALHOST HELO_EQ_LOCALHOST
0.8 UNDISC_RECIPS Valid-
42300
> -Original Message-
> From: Jason Holbrook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 20 November 2007 16:16
> To: Jackson, Jeff; Martin.Hepworth; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Cc: Josh Sindy
> Subject: RE: HAM in Outlook to SA Learn
>
> Jeff:
> Than
Jason
Yes - very easily. You need a spam and ham folder on the ms-exch box that can
be accessed via imap.
Then there are many perl scripts etc you can run on the mailscanner gateway
machine that will grab the email and feed it into sa-learn.
NB users need to move not copy emails for training o
Mark
you mean 3.2.3 rather than 2.3.2??? ;-)
--
martin
On Sun, 4 Nov 2007 09:49:04 -
"Obantec Support" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
SA 2.3.2 on FC3
time and date on server is correct but during routine
checks i found to files in /tmp
.spamassassin12592Gefj53tmp
.spamassassin12592PV3
Justin
Well it's there, just doesn't seem to work !
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 19 October 2007 10:55
> To: Martin.Hepworth
Peter
Get the latest ruleset for SA using sa-update, this works around an issue with
whois lookups.
Only run a few RBL's - you're running them all and this will take some time.
Running a local caching nameserver on the box will help as well.
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> -Original Message-
> From: UxBoD [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 19 October 2007 09:14
> To: Martin.Hepworth
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: MP3 Spam
>
> Hmmm, hit okay here Martin :-
&
http://www.solidstatelogic.com/mp3-spam.txt
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> -Original Message-
> From: UxBoD [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 19 October 2007 09:01
> To: Martin.Hepworth
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Just tried this on an example we had overnight and it's didn't hit ;-(
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> -Original Message-
> From: UxBoD [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 19 October 2007 08:45
> To: Justin Mason
> Cc: users@spamassa
My SA setup is way better than that on it's own, but I have lots of 3rd parts
rules in the mix..
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> -Original Message-
> From: Kent Borg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 16 October 2007 15:46
> To: us
Also rejecting non-existant recipients straight away helps a lot - I'm dropping
over 65% of my traffic this way..
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Wilbraham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 01 Octobe
Hi
Check the permissions on the file for that file/directory structure and user.
If you haven't got a backup then there are some nice starter DB's to get you
going at wwwl.fsl.com/support.
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> -Original Mes
Hi
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> -Original Message-
> From: Sg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 04 September 2007 10:22
> To: Martin.Hepworth
> Subject: Re: my collegue id received as spam
>
Hi
Still not w
Hi
I mean why does SA think this is spam? What rules are firing within
spamassassin.
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> -Original Message-
> From: Sg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 04 September 2007 08:38
> To: Mar
Sg
Can you please show us what rules fired so we can advise.
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> -Original Message-
> From: Sg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 04 September 2007 07:06
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: my
Richard
You could setup a gateway with either MailScanner or Amavis-new
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> -Original Message-
> From: richard venne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 28 August 2007 14:32
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apach
> -Original Message-
> From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of René Berber
> Sent: 22 August 2007 07:42
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: BOTNET Exceptions for Today
>
> John Rudd wrote:
>
> > René Berber wrote:
> >> Here's a good example of why Botnet's default
Yossim
More appropriate to the mailscanner list, but as part of the spam and/or high
spam action add in the new header.
Have a look at the comments in the MailScanner.conf file above these settings.
If you're still stuck ask on the mailscanner list.
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Hi
When you do the --lint -D etc make sure you're doing this as the user
Mailscanner runs as (v important if running non-sendmail as the MTA).
Also try "Mailcanner --debug --debug-sa"
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> -Original Message
Ecard spams get scored as follows.
5.40BAYES_99Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
4.00DCC_CHECK Listed in DCC (http://rhyolite.com/anti-spam/dcc/)
0.77DIGEST_MULTIPLE Message hits more than one network digest check
0.90HOST_EQ_RO
4.00NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP
44 (0)1865 842300
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin.Hepworth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 08 August 2007 16:50
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: lottery spam as .doc files
>
>
>
> Heads up, the pdf stock spam has morphed to ms-word files for lottery
> w
n [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 08 August 2007 23:33
> To: Martin.Hepworth
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: FW: AWARD NOTIFICATION:
>
> On Wed, 8 Aug 2007, Martin.Hepworth wrote:
>
> > As requested...
>
> Sending a 700KB attachment to a popular ma
It's huge 660KB for the attachments...
I'll dig out a place to drop it to..
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> -Original Message-
> From: Banyan He [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 08 August 2007 17:12
> To
Heads up, the pdf stock spam has morphed to ms-word files for lottery winnings..
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
**
Confidentiality : This e-mail and any attachments ar
Hi
Turn off the RBL's (or only use a couple). DNS checks can take along time.
Yes SA is very memory hungry..
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> -Original Message-
> From: Néher Márton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 08 August
Hi
I'd start by only using a couple of RBL's (give the others zero scores in
local.cf).
I'd also check how you're calling SA? I'd not call SA for large emails (above
100k) so save a lot of time.
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> -Orig
Maybe obsolete for sare rules (due to ddos issues etc), but its very handy for
other peoples rulesets you want to keep up-to date..
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
t return these hits.
>
> Thanks,
> Donald
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin.Hepworth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 10:55 AM
> To: Dawson, Donald; users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: isolated W
>
>
> Donald
>
>
Donald
Just got in something very similar and it scored thus..
X-Solid-State-Logic-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, SpamAssassin (not
cached,
score=6.311, required 5, BAYES_50 0.00, BOTNET 5.00,
FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D 0.67, HOST_MISMATCH_COM 0.31,
IP_NOT_FRIENDLY 0.33)
--
Martin
Donald
My analysis (SA 3.1.8)
Content analysis details: (10.9 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
--
--
1.5 FH_RELAY_NODNS We could not determine your Reverse DNS
2.5 MISSING_HB_SEP
Alex
In order to work around the Net::DNS issues Theo mentioned it's best to
run a local caching nameserver on the server itself.
That way resolv.onf contains a single nameserver line which solves the
problem.
As an aside this also increases the Spamassassin DNS speed incredibly.
I'm
not kiddin
Chris
Don't compile as root and you'll be fine - already been raised as a bug.
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 13 June 2007 15:46
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.or
Ken
Web site may be having trouble but the BL's are still responding
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> -Original Message-
> From: Ken A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 06 June 2007 17:38
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subjec
Hi
Common problem with perl < 5.8.8 and the SARE rules.
In Messages.pm in the spamassassin perl library add a line like the
following after "use warnings;"...
"use bytes;"
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> -Original Message-
Hi
You sure about that MailScanner versionm or is it a typo?
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> -Original Message-
> From: leiw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 16 May 2007 03:45
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: SpamAss
Any more details - which version of FreeBSD, how are you trying to
install it (ports/cpan/source???)
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> -Original Message-
> From: Mailing List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 28 April 2007 18:00
> To:
Rob
Might be worthwhile moving this to the MailScanner list as it's nothing
to do with SA per sa.
But what version of MailScanner are you running, as I can't see anything
that would block png files by default.
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
Scores well on my system...
Content analysis details: (14.0 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
--
--
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
1.3 NA_DOLLARS BODY:
Guys
Looks like a MailScanner config issue.
May I suggest we take this over the MailScannre list and we'll help
there..
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 02 A
Paul
Have a look at the DefenderMX range (and something new due any day now),
from www.fsl.com.
Basically is a commercial version of MailScanner (with added stuff on
it).
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> -Original Message-
> From:
Andy
And this one
Content analysis details: (8.1 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
--
--
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0.6 J_CHICKENPOX_71BODY: {7}Letter -
Andy
This scores 7.1 for me..
Content analysis details: (7.1 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
--
--
1.0 L_DRUGS12 L_DRUGS12
0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO Received: contains a forg
Ask on the MailScanner list (if not already) and we'll show you how to
attach a ruleset to the correct parameter in MailScanner.conf
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> -Original Message-
> From: [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 1
Ben
I found A LOT of spam tries secondary MX first as a way to circumvent
spam filters..
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Hanson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 08 February 2007 13:55
> To: users@spa
Todd
Mangled.cf from www.rulesemporium.com/other-rules.htm works well for me
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> -Original Message-
> From: Todd Adamson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 07 February 2007 14:48
> To: users@spamassassin.a
Gene
Yup same for meI've just emailed Chris about it..
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> -Original Message-
> From: Gene Heskett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 05 February 2007 14:14
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subje
Jarek
Looks like the spammers are trying to fool you into not checking email
based on this header - ie it's already been scanned so I'll let it
through..
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> -Original Message-
> From: Jarek [mailto:[EMA
Simon
I use this rule to find URL's with illegal characters in it..
# 2007-01-24 new rules (adapted from Henrik Krohns
# <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on SA list) # http:// [user [:password] @]
# + <1 illegal char> + # + ( or / or ? or :)
uri local_OBFUDOM
/https?:\/\/([a-z0-9._\-]{1
Hi
Getting email with the following style of obsfucation in it..
Viaz_gra $1, 80
Ciaz_lis $3, 00
Leviz_tra $3, 35
only following rules..
score=6.17
5 required
5.40BAYES_99Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
0.14FORGED_RCVD_HELOReceived: contains a forged HELO
Hi
The sare and fred rules from www.rulesemporium.com are useful here.
Also DCC pyzor and razor2 can help.
Also make sure you've sa-updated the latest 3.1.7 core rules as these
have some tuning to help..
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
>
Hmm that looks very wrong..
Should be /var/lib if not blank nowaways..
I wonder if you're confusing the User State dir with the spamassassin
cache dir in MailScanner..
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> -Original Message-
> From: The
> you'll have to use the cron method..
> >
> > --
> > Martin Hepworth
> > Snr Systems Administrator
> > Solid State Logic
> > Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Nigel Robson [mailto:[EMAI
t;
> >> Martin Hepworth-3 wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Nigel
> >> >
> >> > List is best..
> >> >
> >> > Commented out is fine - as in that's what I've got.. ;-)
> >> >
> >> > If you're oth
; -Original Message-
> From: Nigel Robson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 19 January 2007 09:54
> To: Martin.Hepworth
> Subject: RE: Runing out of Disk Space
>
> Hi there Martin. I'm not sure if I am meant to reply back to you or
the
> forum?
>
> Anyway,
Nigel
Ideally this would be on the mailscanner list...
There's a couple of ways MailScanner can expire the bayes tokens down,
and which one works for you seems to be hit and miss from my
experience..
1st method is to use the 'internal' MailScanner method. In
MailScanner.conf, make sure
Rebuild
Jon
Dcc, pyzor (using a working server) and razor are useful..
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> -Original Message-
> From: Jon Bjorn Njalsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 17 January 2007 14:47
> To: Martin.Hepworth
Jon
Yes this functionality has been built in since SA version 3.0 (and via
an additional 'plugin' since 2.6.?4?).
Make sure you are using network tests, Net::DNS perl module is installed
and the URI-RBL plugin is enabled in the *.pre files which are located
in the same place as local.cf (normally
've got
the URIRBL plugin installed and the Net::DNS perl module..
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> -Original Message-
> From: Clay Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 11 January 2007 16:14
> To: Martin.Hepw
44 (0)1865 842300
> -Original Message-
> From: Clay Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 11 January 2007 15:44
> To: Martin.Hepworth; users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Avoiding Bayes Poison
>
> No its all kinda like the attached.
> C
>
> >&
Clay
This spam hasn't got a nice image in it with the actual spam message in
it has it??
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
> -Original Message-
> From: Clay Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 11 January 2007 14:58
> To: users@spam
86 matches
Mail list logo