Re: Logwatch message triggers spamd to consume 900+MB of RAM

Edward Muller wrote: Once of my servers can generate fairly large logwatch emails. These emails cause spamassassin to consume memory until it's killed. I removed any custom rules that I had (I had some sare rules) and the problem still occurred. [...] Any ideas? Whitelist the logwatch source

Re: diferent rules hitting with diferent users

Robert Menschel wrote: Hello Matías, Friday, February 11, 2005, 8:48:18 AM, you wrote: MLB> I just got a spam message in my inbox without being flagged by SA, and I MLB> find it very curios because it was a clear spam message. Wen I examine MLB> the headers to see the score assigned by SA I get mor

Re: diferent rules hitting with diferent users

Matt Kettler wrote: At 11:48 AM 2/11/2005, Matías López Bergero wrote: I copy the message a feed SA with it X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99,HTML_80_90, HTML_FONT_BIG,HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_08,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_QP_LONG_LINE autolearn=no version=3.0.2 OK, here it

Re: question about bayes and awl.

Robert Menschel wrote: Hello Matias, Thursday, February 10, 2005, 10:29:08 AM, you wrote: MLB> The bayes and awl db are working only for the user who owns them right? MLB> What about the bayes data created with the sa-learn command? MLB> I'm being training spamassassin Bayesian filter since the ins

Re: bayesian filter training

Matt Kettler wrote: At 11:15 AM 2/11/2005, Matías López Bergero wrote: The sa-learn man page says that for a good training of the Bayesian filter, you need to train it with equal amounts of spam and ham, or more ham if is possible. So if I sa-learn the spam folder, the spam tokens are going to

diferent rules hitting with diferent users

Hi, I just got a spam message in my inbox without being flagged by SA, and I find it very curios because it was a clear spam message. Wen I examine the headers to see the score assigned by SA I get more surprised Content analysis details: (0.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name

Re: bayesian filter training

Matt Kettler wrote: At 05:06 PM 2/10/2005, Matias Lopez Bergero wrote: It is worth to train the bayes filter with messages already detected and flagged as spam by spamassassin? That would do any good? Yes. And even if they are already flagged as BAYES_99 it is still worthwhile. Many thanks for th

Re: spamd process using to much cpu

Hello Matt, Thank you for ur answer, Matt Kettler dijo: > At 04:13 PM 11/18/2004, Matias Lopez Bergero wrote: >>I'm seeing a heavy cpu usage in some process of spamd for a long time and >>sometimes they just hang there until I kill them(usage goes from 80% to >> 97%). >>Also my system is reporting