what about ipost.com .. anyone seen any issues with them?
-Matthew
On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 18:07 -0400, Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, Matthew Lenz wrote:
>
> > The company I work with would like to start sending out a monthly flier
> > to our busines
The company I work with would like to start sending out a monthly flier
to our business contacts. We've found one that seems to offer what we
are looking for: http://www.constantcontact.com/ My first priority is
that whoever we use has no history of being a spammer haven and that the
emails don't
Also make sure that if you are using bayes learning that spamassassin is
still able to read the bayes_ files. There must have been some
incompatibility with mine because I had to nuke everyones bayes_ files
and return sa-learn so that bayes started kicking in again. Also the
config problem that B
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=ham
version=3.0.3
X-Spam-Report: * 0.7 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Isn't being in the the auto white-list a good thing?
-Matt
I believe that only works with a redirect/bounce though and outlook express
doesn't support it. dunno about your users but with mine that represents
about 95% of the users. What about IMAP? If you have your users switch to
IMAP you can just have a Spam folder for each account. Can't think of
will there be a test mentioned in the report as to whether bayes was
used in the test of the email? I've used sa-learn on several hundred
missed and caught spams but i still don't see any mention of bayes use
in the report header (I am seeing autolearn=(ham|spam|no) from time to
time as expected)
works perfectly. thanks dude!
-Matt
- Original Message -
From: "Keith Amling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2005 1:33 AM
Subject: Re: enabable x-spam-report in all emails ham or spam
is it possible to enable the addition of the x-spam-report in all emails?
I
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Matthew Lenz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2005 6:59 PM
Subject: Re: enabable x-spam-report in all emails ham or spam
Matthew Lenz wrote:
is it possible to e
is it possible to enable the addition of the x-spam-report in all emails?
-matt
after 30minutes of activity) it could also temporary add them as
trusted_network ips. that would be really cool.
- Original Message -
From: "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Matthew Lenz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Friday, September 23,
hey are in
experimental or unstable it makes it more difficult unless you wanna do
weird pinning stuff I like the way that backports.org does it giving each
package its own repository. works really well :)
-Matt
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 02:08:40PM -0500, Matthew Lenz wrote:
it makes me wonder if
Matthew Lenz wrote:
ok. i think i got it. what parts of the headers does spamassassin look at
for trusted_networks? my guess is that if there are any untrusted ip's
mentioned in the received: headers it marks it as untrusted?
Yeah, it trusts each received header starting from the top
ip sending
emails to one another on that same machine. how does it know that isn't a
direct MX spam?
- Original Message -
From: "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Matthew Lenz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Friday, September
fficult to understand. :(
- Original Message -
From: "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Matthew Lenz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 4:03 PM
Subject: Re: arrrgh.. debian sarge spamassassin worthless?
Matthew Lenz wrote:
i
- Original Message -
From: "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2005 2:54 PM
Subject: Re: arrrgh.. debian sarge spamassassin worthless?
Matthew Lenz wrote:
it makes me wonder if maybe the debian guys messed with the rankin
ave been seeing a large increase in spam overall, I wouldn't be so sure
> if it's anything you caused.
>
>
>
>
> Matthew Lenz wrote:
> > so much spam is getting in since I switched to sarge. anyone else
> > have this problem? it looks like the tests are wo
so much spam is getting in since I switched to sarge. anyone else have
this problem? it looks like the tests are working but stuff that is so
obviously spam is getting right through.
if i add -D to /etc/default/spamassassin:OPTIONS will the output go to
the syslog?
-Matt
I got a phishing scam email from one 'Batman Cole' .. batman? ... goood
lord. hehe
- Original Message -
From: "David B Funk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 6:23 PM
Subject: Re: OT: Do spammers have a sense of humor?
On Sat, 9 Apr 2005, List Mail User wrote:
Obvio
Anyone know why the /etc/mail/spamassassin
and /usr/local/share/spamassassin stuff isn't being included in
the .packlist? I realize that there might be some concern about them
being removed if the package is uninstalled (unlikely) but its also kind
of against everything for which the .packlist sta
- Original Message -
From: "AltGrendel"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 8:50 PM
Subject: Re: my girlfriend is getting ticked :)
Mike Jackson wrote:
Your bayes database looked to be reasonably trained. The false-negative
was labeled 99% spam by Bayes.
I don't see any RBL checks, w
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 14:28 -0800, Morris Jones wrote:
> Mike Jackson wrote:
> > In my experience, it's more efficient to let the MTA handle the RBL
> > checks instead of Spamassassin. I can't remember what MTA the OP was
> > using, but it's trivial to set them up in Sendmail. On my employer's
>
I just installed backports perl-libnet-dns (.48, hope that is new
enough .49 is the newest). Is there anywhere I can check to see if
'network tests' (what the SURBL says needs to be enabled) are enabled?
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 14:15 -0800, Morris Jones wrote:
> Matthew Lenz
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 16:45 -0500, Tim Donahue wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 15:27 -0600, Matthew Lenz wrote:
> [snip spam info]
> > Ideas where to start (other than having her change her email address
> > hehe)
>
> It doesn't look like you are using any of the
my girlfriend has been bitching at me for quite some time now to figure
out why spamassassin isn't catching the spam like it used to. I'm using
3.0.2 on a debian woody box. Its from www.backports.org (great site).
Here is an example of the X-Virus/Spam headers from a spam that was
caught:
..
24 matches
Mail list logo
