I get errors like this when I run sa-update from cron
/usr/local/bin/setlock -n /tmp/cronlock.4051759.53932 sh -c
$'/home/skipmorrow/bin/sa-update --gpgkey 6C6191E3 --channel
sought.rules.yerp.org'
gpg: WARNING: unsafe ownership on homedir
`/home/skipmorrow/etc/mail/spamassassin/sa-update-keys'
Thanks, Matt. I call my sa-update in a script from cron. I don't think I
have a permissions problem, but I agree, that is what it looks like.
Perhaps this will shed a little light.
skipmor...@ps11651:~$ id
uid=15203(skipmorrow) gid=588771(pg652) groups=588771(pg652)
; #added line here
if (eval { require Razor2::Client::Agent; }) {
$self-{razor2_available} = 1;
dbg(razor2: razor2 is available, version .
$Razor2::Client::Version::VERSION . \n);
}
It's working great for me now. Thanks to everyone who tried helping over
email :)
Skip
MrGibbage
I have read the help pages for those two settings over and over, and I guess
I'm just not smart enough. I can't figure out what I should put for those
two settings. Can one of you give me a hand by looking at the headers from
an email? I can tell you that my SA installation is on
Wow, I had a feeling I was opening a can of worms here. This is one area
where I really feel the SA documentation could benefit by having some real
world examples.
Right now I am just going with the one internal_networks set to the ip of my
SA server. I'm not setting any trusted_networks. I
I have been trying to install Razor2 for two days now. I am on a Dreamhost
VPS, but I don't have root access, so my perl modules go in ~/share/perl. I
have that in my PERL5LIB environment variable. And yet, when I receive an
email, I get the following types of messages in my logs:
[20377] dbg:
Just a little off topic here, but relevant. When I test SA, I log into a
bash shell. I set my environment variables in .bash_profile (loading
changes with the 'source' command). Sometimes when testing, I get different
results than I do when processing real mail. I think it is because when my
I also just switched web hosts and went with Dream Host, primarily because
they do allow you to run your own compiled SA installation (you can of
course use theirs if you wish), including bayes, should you chose. You will
have to use one of their Private Servers, which does cost a little more,
OK, Now I also get very different results, which seems to be inline with what
you two have seen.
http://pelorus.org/fourth_pass_log.txt
And while there are some small differences between the sub-tests that hit,
the overall score is still zero for my installation. So perhaps I just need
to
Is this the MEDS rule thread that you refer to?
http://www.nabble.com/-NEW-SPAM-FLOOD--www.shopXX.net-td24139422.html
Skip
John Wilcock wrote:
Le 06/07/2009 14:22, RW a écrit :
http://pelorus.org/spammy.txt
That's odd, I get MISSING_DATE, MISSING_HB_SEP, MISSING_HEADERS,
MISSING_MID,
What would cause my SA installation to score a message 0 every once in a
while? Last night I received a spam message in my inbox, which is kinda
strange since SA is pretty much foolproof for me. Upon further
investigation, I found out that the message was scored 0 --not a single hit
on any
be possible that I gorked something up in the transition.
Regards,
Skip
Benny Pedersen wrote:
On Mon, July 6, 2009 01:29, MrGibbage wrote:
Hoping for some help,
whitelist all trusted senders in cpanel, and lover default kill score, so
all will get in quarantine if sender is not known
for the help!
Skip
RW-15 wrote:
On Sun, 5 Jul 2009 16:29:25 -0700 (PDT)
MrGibbage s...@pelorus.org wrote:
What would cause my SA installation to score a message 0 every once
in a while? Last night I received a spam message in my inbox, which
is kinda strange since SA is pretty much
13 matches
Mail list logo
