Strangely enough I have been looking at why SA has suddenly started to act
up and I also seem to be having DNS timeout issues after years of faultless
operation. I am running a local caching nameserver, but spamassassin -D just
stops dead as follows:
[8808] dbg: logger: adding facilities: all
[8695] dbg: FuzzyOcr: in 15 lines
[8695] dbg: FuzzyOcr: in 15 lines
[8695] dbg: FuzzyOcr: (67 word occurrences found)
[8695] dbg: FuzzyOcr: Remove DIR: /tmp/.spamassassin8695S9N6D5tmp
[8695] dbg: FuzzyOcr: FuzzyOcr ending successfully...
Any ideas?
Thanks
Nigel Kendrick
-Original Message-
From: Nigel Kendrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 9:11 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: FuzzyOCR matches word
Hi,
I have just upgraded from FuzzOCR 2.3b to the 3.4.2 devel by copying over
the .cf and .pm files, re-making
-Original Message-
From: Nigel Kendrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 9:11 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: FuzzyOCR matches word
Hi,
I have just upgraded from FuzzOCR 2.3b to the 3.4.2 devel by copying over
the .cf and .pm files, re-making
without you all!
Nigel Kendrick
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of René Berber
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 1:06 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: FuzzyOCR Plugin question
Evan Platt wrote:
I hope someone here can help, I've looked at the FuzzyOCR wiki and
Hi Guys,
We have recently been suffering from tons of inline image spam but this has
been pretty much killed by installing FuzzyOCR. Over the last week I have
been adding to the FuzzyOCR words file, and recently went on a Web search to
see what other lists I could find - to my surprise there
FuzzyOcr is proving to be useful but it does seem to be a bit too 'Fuzzy' at
times...
[2006-12-08 13:27:47] Debug mode: Found word best in line
shotermprcetargetoo
with fuzz of 0.25 scanned with scanset /usr/bin/gocr
-i -
[2006-12-08 13:27:47] Debug
I have just had a bogus Microsoft update slip through the net. Is there a
rule to combat these? In any case, here's the info in case it's of use:
From: MS Technical Services [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject line: Newest Microsoft Critical Pack
The attachment was Upgrade9591.exe
Here's the body, minus
Apologies - just noticed that the mail was picked up from a third party
server, not our in-house one, and was dumped into the wrong folder due to an
Outlook rules error.
I've just tried sending an .exe through our mail server and it was blocked.
NK
10 matches
Mail list logo
