SA3.0.2, rewrite and transform spam

2005-01-27 Thread Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina
Hello. I have a problem with one mail system. First, I used an exim4 MTA combined with SA. (Let SA be SpamAssassin) SA used to rewrite the X-Spam-xxx flags to report what he finds. It's OK, the stuff work very well, the $HOME/.forward filter on X-Spam-xxx header is OK. SA changes the spam

RE: SA3.0.2, rewrite and transform spam

2005-01-27 Thread Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina
( Thu, 27 Jan 2005 17:04:47 -0500 ) Chris Santerre : If I misunderstood this, I'm sorry. But can you sip the first server from scanning the messege with SA? Seems the logical solution. Not really. Because SA still have tu run on the first server. I leave it, but the users stay :-) Well I

RCVD_IN_ORBS

2004-12-30 Thread Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina
Hello, I would like to know if there are some other open relay list, because I think the default behaviour of the dorkslayers server is not really good: it tells RCVD_IN_ORBS RBL: Received via a relay in orbs.dorkslayers.com [66.218.66.58 listed in orbs.dorkslayers.com]

Re: RCVD_IN_ORBS

2004-12-30 Thread Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina
On Thu, 2004-12-30 at 01:49 -0500, Matt Kettler wrote: What ancient version of SA are you using? RCVD_IN_ORBS hasn't been a part of SA in a LONG time. The last version of SA to include this test in the ruleset at all was 2.55 (may 2003). I already heard that on this list, and I have

Re: RCVD_IN_ORBS

2004-12-30 Thread Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina
On Thu, 2004-12-30 at 00:06 -0800, Loren Wilton wrote: If you are on 3.0 and you installed in a clean directory it is impossible that this is in the stock rules. So it must be left over in some site-specific rules you have somewhere. # grep RCVD_IN_ORBS *.cf 20_head_tests.cf:header

does SA report to razor ?

2004-12-29 Thread Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina
Hello, I see that SA checks razor DB. Great. I guess SA also report spam to the razor DB by default. Am I right ? -- ASPO Infogérance http://aspo.rktmb.org/activites/infogerance Unofficial FAQ fcolc http://faq.fcolc.eu.org/ LUG sur Orléans et alentours. Tél : 02 38 76 43 65 (France)

SA 3.0.1 - 1.9 BAYES_99

2004-12-28 Thread Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina
Hello, I see that in SA 3x, the scores have changed. I would like to increase/decrease the scores of come criterias. Espacielly the BAYES_99 test. My /etc/spamassassin/50_scores.cf file does not contain any indication about it, and I see it's scored 1.9 instead of the 1 told by the heading

Recent Debian Package

2004-12-14 Thread Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina
Hello, I'm looking for a recent package of Spamassassin for Debian STABLE (Woody) please. Either 2.64 or 3.x ? The apt-get.org has no one. Where could I find ? [This is a crosspost to SA and Debian list so please set the Reply-to:] -- ASPO Infogérance

Re: is this list exceptionally quiet ?

2004-12-05 Thread Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina
On Sun, 2004-12-05 at 13:50, Greg - Cirelle Enterprises wrote: or is my email messed up again May be or singature is too much long :-) -- ASPO Infogérance http://aspo.rktmb.org/activites/infogerance Unofficial FAQ fcolc http://faq.fcolc.eu.org/ LUG sur Orléans et alentours. Tél : 02 38

Messages received via OR

2004-11-29 Thread Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina
HEllo, I would like to know how to increase the rate or the mark of a message received from an open relay. In fact, we're 99,9% sure that it's a spam! are'nt we? I would like to set the rate of the RCVD_IN_ORBS to 4 (at least). How to ? Is it a good idea ? -- ASPO Infogérance

Re: Messages received via OR

2004-11-29 Thread Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina
On Mon, 2004-11-29 at 19:19, Matt Kettler wrote: By the way, how ancient a version of SA are you using? ORBS hasn't been used by SA since 2.55. (although alternate-language describes existed through 2.64, no actual rule exists in the 2.6x or 3.x families) # spamassassin -V SpamAssassin

What user should I run sa-learn ?

2004-11-22 Thread Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina
Hello, I'm running SA 2.64 and I wonder what user should I run sa-learn under. the exim process is ownned by the Debian-user user (Debian testing, Exim4). I have more or less 20 real user users on the server (courrier-IMAP), and they all move the spam they receive into a dedicated folder. Each

Re: Are theses error/warning messages OK ?

2004-11-20 Thread Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina
On Fri, 2004-11-19 at 22:27, Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina wrote: Hello, Hello I got these error messages i dont know to interpret. Would you help me to correctly set my system up ? [...] Is there something I have to install more ? The error messages was attached. really no idea about

Are theses error/warning messages OK ?

2004-11-19 Thread Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina
Hello, I just ran SA 2.64 on my Debian Testing (all installed via apt-get) on a x86. I got these error messages i dont know to interpret. Would you help me to correctly set my system up ? The way I run SA: Debian init script OPTIONS=-m 10 -a -H (-d is automatically added by the startup script)