I use to do this and it was fine.
No problem in the low mx and just added points to the high mx in SA.
It did help a little.
A while ago I had to disable it because some major ISPs in Brazil start
to block me out because of this setup.
-rsd
On 12/08/2010 03:32 PM, Matt wrote:
Anyone using
On 12/01/2010 02:13 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 07:27 -0800, Marc Perkel wrote:
I've been thinking about what it would take to actually eliminate spam
or reduce it to less than 10% of what it is now. One of the problems is
the SMTP protocol itself. And a big problem with
to
time.
Its not all yahoo servers, but random ones.
Never cared to check deeper. Just assume they need maintance as others
yahoos are fine in the meanwhile.
-Raul Dias
On 08/18/2010 10:14 PM, Marc Perkel wrote:
[...] They were discussing ways to reduce spam and I mentioned it. [...]
I believe, that 95% of the discussion in this list is about reducing
spam in a way or another.
-rsd
and whitelisting broken
sender.
3 - Something else.
-Raul Dias
even be blocked, so whats the point of
doing this?
(btw, cant dkim have sending hosts specifieds like spf?)
-Raul Dias
You need a lot more of bandwidth/memory/cpu power and disk IO to do it.
-Raul Dias
of work (so, gsc20007).
Without this kind of support, I see it will be easier in the future
spammers playing with charset to avoid specific rules.
-Raul Dias
) normalize_charset option is set to 1.
-Raul Dias
--j.
Raul Dias writes:
On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 15:35 +, Justin Mason wrote:
Theo Van Dinter writes:
I'm assuming that there will be a Google Summer of Code 2007 going on,
and
that the ASF will be involved again. So it's a good
On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 17:27 +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
Raul Dias writes:
On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 15:29 +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
actually I think this is already implemented in 3.2.0 -- see
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4636 for details.
Nice. This patch
On Sat, 2007-02-17 at 11:21 +, Justin Mason wrote:
Raul Dias writes:
On Sat, 2007-02-17 at 02:07 +0100, Mark Martinec wrote:
On Saturday February 17 2007 01:49, Matthew Wilson wrote:
I was/am primarily concerned with RAM usage for high-concurrency
situations.
Ok. Still
For some reason I had 3 lines deleted in the plugin when I sent it.
here is the correct version.
-Raul Dias
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 15:26 -0300, Raul Dias wrote:
Hi,
I, as other people, needed to whitelist addresses that came from servers
with no rdns. whitelist_from is not a good option
What happens when a clueless newbie tries to pass spam?
This happens = http://www.dias.com.br/worst-spam.txt
-Raul Dias
reuse.
- The pluginization of SA. From Bayes to header, body, rawbody, score
rules. The entire process of doing so would open doors for more
external plugin usage and control.
While this might bring a slightly slower startup. In the long run, the
bennefits can be great.
-Raul Dias
played a lot with perl-loop (any loopers around?)
which was the only way to go. It is too low level for most people, but
perhaps POE is the way to go today (which can use perl-loop as its
base).
-Raul Dias
} =
+ !defined($signature-domain) ? missing d tag
+ : invalid domain in d tag
Missing ; here, right?
return 0;
}
-Raul Dias
environment like cygwin.
-Raul Dias
.
Just for the record, the sa-learn has messages (one eache time) fed thru
stdin from a cyrus imapd folder.
-Raul Dias
its your users' account name.
-Raul Dias
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 17:56 +0100, Alex Thorst wrote:
Raul Dias schrieb:
On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 15:44 +0100, Alex Thor wrote:
Hi there!
Is there a way to convince spamassassin to read the *user_prefs* file
not from ~/.spamassassin
Hi,
I, as other people, needed to whitelist addresses that came from servers
with no rdns. whitelist_from is not a good option, so I implemented
whitelist_from_rcvd_ip as a plugin.
Here is the man page.
Comments are welcome.
-Raul Dias
NAME
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::WhitelistRcvdIP
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 12:45 -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 02:15:47PM -0300, Raul Dias wrote:
archive-iterator: invalid (undef) format in target list, 2
at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/ArchiveIterator.pm
line 727, STDIN line 1.
Just
to date?
because Timeout is not a plugin.
-Raul Dias
in SpamAssassin.pm. You might add more dirs instead of replace.
But why not stick with sql?
-Raul Dias
to broken DK implementation on the sender, shouldnt
this be reflect as some score instead of a warning?
-Raul Dias
guys think about the idea, problems,
enhancements.
-Raul Dias
RememberMe.pm
Description: Perl program
Be aware that it may give you some false positives on images with texts.
Even in pt_BR (in my case).
-Raul Dias
On Sun, 2007-02-11 at 23:38 -0600, René Berber wrote:
Peter wrote:
I have seen a lot of buzz around FuzzyOCR lately but by looking at its
web site it shows that the project
There are some cases, that it is desired to match part a value from a
header, to another value somewhere else.
Is there a way for SA to retain the value matched in a RE like $1/$2
matching parentheses, so that it might be used later (or at least in the
next rule)?
-Raul Dias
On Sun, 2007-02-11 at 15:49 -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
Raul Dias wrote:
There are some cases, that it is desired to match part a value from a
header, to another value somewhere else.
Is there a way for SA to retain the value matched in a RE like $1/$2
matching parentheses, so
commented out)
If spamhaus decides expand the ruturn code and 127.0.0.20 becomes valid
for something like this ip has an opt-in list, this rule would be
broken, right? (sure, we dont expect this change to happen).
-Raul Dias
Bayes is missed (per user is used), but would help separated
the grey area even more for non monitored users or low volume users.
in the scripts side I use Mail::IMAPClient and I urge anyone writting
your own scripts to stay away from Mail::Box.
-Raul Dias
On Sat, 2007-02-10 at 16:53 -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 10:09:35AM -0300, Raul Dias wrote:
This also implies that the sub-test values is always a RE and needs to
be proper delimeted.
If you read perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf, specifically the
check_rbl_sub
everything to
utf-8 first before running the REs?
This is something to consider with most non english languages.
Or is this something I shouldn't worry about?
-Raul Dias
?
If it really is a RE, what preventes '127.0.0.1' to not match
127.0.0.10? Or 127.1.0.1 to not match 127.120.1.1 ? Shouldn't the dots
be escaped too?
Thats enought for now :)
- Raul Dias
that
domain (if it delivers any outbound mail at all).
Would a whitelist_from_mx option perhaps be worthwile?
Being sent from the mx is a legitimate deliverer, but I dont think that
worth being whitelisted. On the other hand comming from the MX would
worth some bonus points.
-Raul Dias
being
whitelisted, it can enable all mails from that host, which would also
prevents your problem automatically in a few days. (I dont really like
this, though).
-Raul Dias
and then
filter a copy to check it out for some time.
If you have procmail, you can try something like:
:0 c
* ^X-Spam-Status:.*ADD_YOUR_RULE_NAME_HERE.*
/spam/emv1_net.mbox
-Raul Dias
)
Sub that for an aliases ip address in your server that can be reach from
the outside.
-Raul Dias
I would like to know opnions
/ham counts that would
make HAWL be ignored [0] )
- high ratio limit (same, for upper limit).
So, what do you think? what to change? what to take care of?
-Raul Dias
this:
@ MX 1 fake.domain
@ MX 10 real.domain
@ MX 100 mx2.domain
@ MX 1000 fake.domain
fake.domain have no ip address
mx2.domain is the fake mx that points to real.domain.
Good results so far.
-Raul Dias
.
-Raul Dias
, is to list a genuine (but firewalled) address.
Done.
Thanks for the heads up.
-Raul Dias
welcome.
Raul Dias
SA steps, the hand made
rule is faster.
-Raul Dias
Hi,
What MUA are you using?
Your MUA seems to be unable to send HTML mail, so I suggest you
configure it to send only text/plain formatted text.
[]s
Raul Dias
On Mon, 2006-09-11 at 07:50 -0700, Floyd wrote:
Hi, I am using Spamassassin with Exchange and i noticed I was getting
different
domain in the main and
where the link is pointing (e.g. foobar.com vs foobar.com.b.fm), but
this could cause more FP than help, _me _sa thinks.
Another way is thru SURBL, but the host can change faster than SURBL.
[]s
Raul Dias
Hi,
What happened to Habeas support in SA?
More than a year ago there was a discussion about using habeas.
There were patchs in there site (gone/broken link) and it would be
incorporated into SA 3.0.x.
Now we have SA 3.1 and no sign of habeas support.
Is it gone for good?
Raul Dias
My bad. I grep the wrong dir.
Do I need to enable it?
It doesn't seem to be working here.
( and now that I said that I can't find a habeas message here to test
*grin*)
Raul Dias
On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 13:28 -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
Raul Dias wrote:
Hi,
What happened to Habeas
Groups all I get is DK_SIGNED.
Can you run it in your sa? [spamassassin|spamc] message
What version of Mail::DomainKeys do you have?
Maybe even at Yahoo, domainkeys is not 100% installed across the SMTP
servers (although, I would expected it to be).
Regards,
Raul Dias
Posted-Date: Mon, 31 Oct
of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
8
Thanks,
Raul Dias
the archieves and docs, for any reference of this and found
none before I upgraded.
The X-Spam.* headers are always present.
[]'s
Raul Dias
On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 09:12 +0200, Niek wrote:
On 6/6/2005 10:50 PM +0200, Raul Dias wrote:
Ok, I findout some stuff here:
1 - This is not the only message this happens. Other messages that
should have triggered SPF rules did not.
2 - This is happening when using spamd.
3
On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 12:49 -0500, David B Funk wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Raul Dias wrote:
SPF would never work if not there, right?
Note that it does work, but not always.
I have never see it fail from calling the spamassassin form the command
line, just as spamd.
It has enough
ip4:209.1.112.0/23 ~all
...
And here it is 64.4.0.0/18, which 64.4.22.61 belongs.
So, my question is why there was no SPF_* result for this entry?
Is this a bug? Or am I missing the point?
Mail::SPF::Query is the latest one.
Other hotmail messages got the SPF_HELO_PASS fine.
- Raul
, for some reason, spamd sometimes skips SPF tests.
Is this right? Would spamd skip some tests for any reason? Load?
Network timeout?
Any pointer is appreciated.
- Raul Dias
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 17:32 -0300, Raul Dias wrote:
hi,
Is the SPF code working 100%?
I got a mail from hotmail that did
55 matches
Mail list logo
