Re: Install spamassassin

Banyan He wrote: Hi Guys, Can anyone provide me a process how to integrate the spamassassin with postfix. I tried many times. But I cannot identify why I always get the following logs. Mar 10 05:38:26 gateway postfix/qmgr[13424]: 01A8217FBD: to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: pls unsubcribe me

usha chowdary wrote: pls unsubcribe me from this group From the headers: list-unsubscribe:

Re: commerce Antispam Products

> We're looking for a commerce antispam product.It should be high > performance and has the strong ability to capture spams. > Could you recommend me a good product about it?We are an ISP,have > millions of users. > (Please don't say Symantec's brightmail,it's fairly good,but it's too > expensi

Re:

Andreas Walter wrote: unsubscribe end Send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] to unsubscribe.

Re: unsubscribe

Jeremy wrote: unsubscribe __ NOD32 1.1543 (20060517) Information __ This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. http://www.eset.com send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Blank emails

Richard Collyer wrote: Ryan Holowaychuk wrote: I just sent an email and had some lengthy text and it gave it a score of 3.8 What score did the blank e-mail get the one that is getting past the spam filters. Cheers Richard

Re: Blank emails

Ryan Holowaychuk wrote: I just sent an email and had some lengthy text and it gave it a score of 3.8

Re: Blank emails

Ryan Holowaychuk wrote: I am have SA running on a windows machine. Sa 3.1.1 Hmailer Clam ANtivirus I have it set up, but when an email goes through the server I am getting blank emails? what am I missing here? What level is the spam getting? Its probably only tripping one rule for short

Re: SA 99,9% CPU and freeze

nicolas aulas wrote: Any idea what's wrong ? Thanks in advance for your help. Going on that try removing dns availible. Also try and re-install / upgrade Net::DNS perl module. Have you updated perl recentely? Cheers Richard After upgrade Net::DNS to 0.57, I got exactly the same error log

Re: SA 99,9% CPU and freeze

Nicolas Aulas wrote: >> With some mail (don't know why), SA up to 99,9% cpu and freeze mail queu (mail are labelled in postfix as " maybe be sent more than once) With problematic mail, sudo -u amavis -s | spamassassin -t < /root/amavis-20060515T124439-32765/email.txt give : [1353] warn: dns:

Re: Spamassassin spamming system?

David Baron wrote: Not really, but lots of nice instances are really bogging down the system when a lot of emails are being processed. They are run nice 15. How might I reduce this problem? Using a debian Sid, exim4, mail retrieved by fetchmail. Spamassassin and clamd run through procmail.

Re: New script

It depends on what the script does. You could either make it public knowledge that this script exists and host it yourself or dev@spamassassin.apache.org seems like a good place to start. Cheers Richard Drew Burchett wrote: If I have created a new script that can be used with SpamAssassin (not

Re: Reference manual

Steve Sargent wrote: Is there a reference manual with SpamAssassin, and if so were do I get a copy of it? http://spamassassin.apache.org/doc.html Cheers Richard

Re: Very Long Scan Times (3.1.1 on FreeBSD)

John Rudd wrote: It might be good to try running some tests with -L and some tests without -L, to see if the same test is fast without the network check. That would help isolate the problem to "is SpamAssassin slow" or "is SpamAssassin spending a lot of time waiting for DNS results". It pr

Re: Very Long Scan Times (3.1.1 on FreeBSD)

Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: Richard Collyer wrote: I've changed it to a DNS server from my ISP, but so far its not making any difference. SA: finished scan in 13.719613 secs - hits=-1.0 BTW, if you watch the debug output of a message being scanned, you'll see exactly

Re: Very Long Scan Times (3.1.1 on FreeBSD)

Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: ... [31974] dbg: dns: name server: 192.168.1.1, family: 2, ipv6: 0 [31974] dbg: dns: testing resolver nameservers: 192.168.1.1 [31974] dbg: dns: trying (3) google.com... [31974] dbg: dns: looking up NS for 'google.com' [31974] dbg: dns: NS lookup of google.com using 192.

Very Long Scan Times (3.1.1 on FreeBSD)

Hello, I am trying to track down why is is tracking so long for mails to be scanned via FreeBSD. I am scanning then using qmail-scanner (1.25). From what I can see the problem is coming from when e-mails are arriving from external sources. The top log entry shows and e-mail from the lan. Th