>What gets put in the comment is up to the sender.
>They can put *everything* there and it's legit. You do not control it at
all
>
I know it depends on the sender and everything is legit, but it is also
legit if I send an email to somebody talking about the stock market or
certain medicine and i
>a) is probably going to be quite resource-intensive;
I don´t really know, according to
http://www.nabble.com/forum/ViewPost.jtp?post=12207486&framed=y
sm-7 say that it shouldn´t be
>b) requires LDAP, NIS, etc., so that SpamAssassin can have a clue
>about your accounts;
>c) requires competent
John D. Hardin wrote:
>
> On Fri, 17 Aug 2007, aag_uk wrote:
>
> (1) Check your MTA options. Some allow you to configure rejection of a
> message after X number of invalid recipients are given.
>
> (2) Consider a rule that adds a point if more than X names appear in
Hi,
I´m pretty new to SpamAssassin and maybe what I am saying is nonsense or
somebody else has suggested this, or the test already exists but I don´t
know how to configure it, anyway here is my question.
I´ve noticed that some spam messages not marked as spam by spamassassin (the
score is lower
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/why-not-checking-%22name%22-%3Cemail-address-pairs-tf4287913.html#a12206492
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
