Re: DNS Terminology

> On Sep 23, 2016, at 17.34, Lindsay Haisley wrote: > > On Fri, 2016-09-23 at 17:10 -0400, btb wrote: >> On 2016.09.23 16.16, Lindsay Haisley wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, 2016-09-23 at 18:43 +0100, RW wrote: Right, but the question here is why isn't a forwarding server

Re: Customized header (add_header) doesn't work

> On Dec 19, 2015, at 04.35, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > > Am 19.12.2015 um 04:08 schrieb listsb-spamassas...@bitrate.net: >> On Dec 17, 2015, at 13.16, Alfredo Saldanha >> wrote: >>> >>> My second SA is a Zimbra server. >>> I use Zimbra SA

Re: Customized header (add_header) doesn't work

On Dec 17, 2015, at 13.16, Alfredo Saldanha wrote: > > My second SA is a Zimbra server. > I use Zimbra SA only to drop the message in junk folder. > I don't want to clean at the Zimbra server, it is default behavior. for what it's worth, if you were to use amavis

Re: sa-compile seems to not clean up after itself

On Feb 12, 2015, at 14.09, Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com wrote: On 2/11/2015 7:25 PM, listsb-spamassas...@bitrate.net wrote: i hope another solicitation for this help request is ok. It's ok. Overall, I agree. I tested on a devel box and running sa-compile does have an rm line

Re: sa-compile seems to not clean up after itself

i hope another solicitation for this help request is ok. On Feb 04, 2015, at 09.19, btb listsb-spamassas...@bitrate.net wrote: hi- i happened to notice a bunch of old files in /tmp/, related to spamassassin. after a bit of testing, it looks like sa-compile isn't cleaning up after

Re: dealing with mail not yet listed in network tests

On Nov 14, 2014, at 11.41, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: Am 14.11.2014 um 17:11 schrieb listsb-spamassas...@bitrate.net: one characteristic that appears to be pretty consistent is the age of the domain name that a given message references [from header, envelope sender, ptr

spam from creative gtlds

this was discussed a while back, in the context of tlds with names of colors [red, blue, pink, etc]. recently, i'm getting spam from the rocks tld [i can share further detail if it's of interest]. what ultimately happened with the color tlds, in terms of spamassassin? was there a ruleset

Re: possible false positive with FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD?

On Nov 30, 2014, at 15.42, Benny Pedersen m...@junc.eu wrote: On 30. nov. 2014 21.12.06 listsb-spamassas...@bitrate.net wrote: http://dpaste.com/3XTYV0V.txt Is trusted_networks and internal_networks correct both for ipv4 and ipv6 ? Does it match settings in amavisd ? Both sa and

Re: different results when using --debug

On Dec 08, 2014, at 19.28, Mark Martinec mark.martinec...@ijs.si wrote: Actually, looking at a diff of DBM.pm between 3.4.0 and 3.4.1 I can see the taint bug has already been fixed by r1608413: @@ -814,3 +816,3 @@ my @vars = $self-get_storage_variables(); - dbg(bayes: DB journal

message sent to list yesterday

hi- i sent a message to the list yesterday, but have not yet seen it appear. can someone check? my logs indicate successful delivery to mx1.us.apache.org: Dec 3 17:48:24 mta postfix/smtp[10226]: 3jtFgN6Dfmz9s2b: to=users@spamassassin.apache.org, relay=mx1.us.apache.org[140.211.11.136]:25,

Re: message sent to list yesterday

On Dec 04, 2014, at 12.18, Joe Quinn jqu...@pccc.com wrote: On 12/4/2014 11:17 AM, listsb-spamassas...@bitrate.net wrote: hi- i sent a message to the list yesterday, but have not yet seen it appear. can someone check? my logs indicate successful delivery to mx1.us.apache.org: Dec

different results when using --debug

i was testing with a sample message, and noticed that when running manually with --debug, there seem to be numerous differences in the results, such as scores for the same tests differing, visual ordering of results differing [is this significant?], and bayes not being listed when using

possible false positive with FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD?

hi- a message from yahoo seems to have matched FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD, which from my perspective, the message is not forged [see below pastebin - i hope i've not removed anything of importance during anonymization]. i noted that dkim authentication appears to have failed, which, while of interest

Re: dealing with mail not yet listed in network tests

On Nov 14, 2014, at 00.35, John Hardin jhar...@impsec.org wrote: On Thu, 13 Nov 2014, listsb-spamassas...@bitrate.net wrote: all of the emotional postulative opining aside, one possibility i have been considering is having postfix delay relay of messages to the content filter for a few

dealing with mail not yet listed in network tests

hi- i've recently asked about essentially this same topic on the postfix-users mailing list, so apologies to those subjected to the repetition. the topic came up for me a couple of weeks ago when i asked about duplicate spam that was scoring low the first time it was received:

Re: Valid TLDs (was: Re: Custom rule not hitting suddenly?)

On Sep 8, 2014, at 21.45, Karsten Bräckelmann guent...@rudersport.de wrote: Some discussion of the underlying issue. On Tue, 2014-09-09 at 02:59 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: At the time of the 3.3.2 release, the .club TLD simply didn't exist. It has been accepted by IANA just recently.

Re: sanitizing/normalizing messages for feeding sa-learn

On Aug 27, 2014, at 18.13, Quanah Gibson-Mount qua...@zimbra.com wrote: --On Wednesday, August 27, 2014 6:06 PM -0400 btb listsb-spamassas...@bitrate.net wrote: hi- we have a system [zimbra] where users can select a message in the mua interface and click a spam or not spam button.