Re: Bayes: What am I missing

comparity wrote: spamis wrote: Hi comparity, has you could fix the problem updating SA? No, not as far as I can tell. I still get the same spam, and no indication that bayes has been applied. -- I'm using an older version of qmail-scanner-st. I have saw

RE: Why SA don't use bayes for some e-mails?

Robert - elists-2 wrote: Good question. Tough one without debugging your machine personally. Did you do any web searching for this? Have you considered upgrading to current SA 3.2.4 ? - rh Yes, I have been finding any info relative to this, but I can't found nothing. It's

Re: Bayes: What am I missing

comparity wrote: Do you use sa-update? No I don't. However, I have just run it. restarted spamassassin (service spamassassin restart), and I'll see what happens. Hi comparity, has you could fix the problem updating SA? -- View this message in context:

Why SA don't use bayes for some e-mails?

(sorry my poor english) Hi, I have a machine with qmail+qmail-scanner+spamassassin 3.0.0. Some time ago, I have saw that some spam are passing through filter with 0 score. Then, I activated sa_debug='1' and sa_hdr_report='1' in qmail-scanner for see how SA are giving the score to e-mails and I