Re: Adding new header to SA

Hi Steve, Thanks for the info. However the version of MailScanner that i use does not support this attribute. Is there other place were i can add this header. Kindly regards, Yossi Steve Freegard-2 wrote: Matt Kettler wrote: yossim wrote: Hi forum, I am running MailScanner integrated

Adding new header to SA

Hi forum, I am running MailScanner integrated with SA sendmail based. I would like to add a new header to SA report, so the next stage of spam filtering which is the trend micro will always forward the email the outlook junk mail. The header is as follows: X-TM-AS-Product-Ver:

Re: [2] Bayes training question

Thanks Steven, I appriciate your quick response :) I will review the link and try to implement it on our site. Regards, Yossi Steven Stern wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 yossim wrote: Hi folks, Hi can i learn miss identified junk mail that is store

Re: [2] Bayes training question

Steve, I am not sure that i have anderstand the first script starting with get_ham_spam were you use fetchmail (where the data is kept?) and the last one get-ham-spam when you used wget command to get all the ham.spam emails. Kindly regards, Yossi yossim wrote: Thanks Steven, I

Upgrading from SA 3.1.1 to the latest version

Hi folks, I am thinking of upgrading SA to the latest version due to the requirements for installing Fuzzyocr as posted at http://fuzzyocr.own-hero.net/wiki/Installation-3.5.x I have searched this forum for upgrade posting but still there are issues that are not clear ( I have also read the

Bayes training question

Hi folks, Hi can i learn miss identified junk mail that is store on exchange or at the otulook clients? Can i simply copy those mails to a folder on my Linux server and run sa-learn with the required parameters? Kindly regards, Yossi Mor -- View this message in context:

low score spam

Hi forum, recently i get a lot of spam emails with very low score mostly are text emails. How can i fine tune my SA in order to catch those emails? here is an exmple: Hi, Not very good erecxction? You are welcome - http://pdahlmjr.com/l/ jockstrap or sporran woven out of, well possibly,

Re: low score spam

Maybe you should turn on Network tests and configure Razor? On Tuesday 22 August 2006 23:24, yossim wrote: Spam detection software, running on the system pen.homeip.net, has identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message has been attached to this so you can view

Re: using spamdc/spamd getting better results?

Steve Thomas wrote: Hi Yossi, My mail relay is built on sendmail and MailScanner configured wit SA 3.1.1. ... How do i start spamc? IIRC, MailScanner loads the SpamAssassin perl modules directly - it doesn't use spamc/d, nor does it use the spamassassin script. HTH, St-

using spamdc/spamd getting better results?

Hello forum, i read that SA can be worked in one of the following modes :spamassassin or spamd/spamc. My mail relay is built on sendmail and MailScanner configured wit SA 3.1.1. I read several posting that state that working with spamd/spamc option is the better one due to better performance.

Re: Isssues after upgrading / updating SA

Hi Kai, Thank very much for your assitence. I will take a close look on SA issues in the coming days. Where i disable the dns testing? i did not find any setting in the local.cf Regards, Yossi -- View this message in context: