Re: [ot] Re: HTML-tests good or bad?

2006-08-11 Thread jdow
From: "Bill Horne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Aug 10, 2006, at 8:42 PM, jdow wrote: >I skipped step three. >{+_+}This will haunt me forever, right? Not at all, we're not that kind of people. Mind you, we have been known to have a _little_ fun now and then, so if it's not too much trouble, w

Re: [ot] Re: HTML-tests good or bad?

2006-08-11 Thread Bill Horne
> On Aug 10, 2006, at 8:42 PM, jdow wrote: > > >I skipped step three. > >{+_+}This will haunt me forever, right? Not at all, we're not that kind of people. Mind you, we have been known to have a _little_ fun now and then, so if it's not too much trouble, would you please supply - The name

Re: [ot] Re: HTML-tests good or bad?

2006-08-11 Thread jdow
From: "Kurt Buff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | From: jdow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | - Original Message - | From: "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | To: | Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 16:00 | Subject: [ot] Re: HTML-tests good or bad? |

RE: [ot] Re: HTML-tests good or bad?

2006-08-11 Thread Kurt Buff
| From: jdow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | - Original Message - | From: "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | To: | Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 16:00 | Subject: [ot] Re: HTML-tests good or bad? | | | > jdow wrote: | >> From: "John Rudd"

RE: [ot] Re: HTML-tests good or bad?

2006-08-11 Thread Chris Santerre
Title: RE: [ot] Re: HTML-tests good or bad? > -Original Message- > From: John Rudd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 12:50 AM > To: jdow > Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: [ot] Re: HTML-tests good or bad? > > >

Re: [ot] Re: HTML-tests good or bad?

2006-08-10 Thread John Rudd
On Aug 10, 2006, at 8:42 PM, jdow wrote: I skipped step three. {+_+}This will haunt me forever, right? Only as long as we know you :-)

Re: [ot] Re: HTML-tests good or bad?

2006-08-10 Thread jdow
From: "Kelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: Actually spelled correctly but I picked the wrong synonym. So it was a case of synonymitis. (Yeah, I admit I am prone to neologisms.) {^_-} Nope. "righting" isn't a synonym for "writing". :p Homophonitis, perhaps? Yup - I ski

Re: [ot] Re: HTML-tests good or bad?

2006-08-10 Thread jdow
- Original Message - From: "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 16:00 Subject: [ot] Re: HTML-tests good or bad? jdow wrote: From: "John Rudd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Aug 9, 2006, at 8:08 PM, Daryl C.

Re: [ot] Re: HTML-tests good or bad?

2006-08-10 Thread Kelson
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: Actually spelled correctly but I picked the wrong synonym. So it was a case of synonymitis. (Yeah, I admit I am prone to neologisms.) {^_-} Nope. "righting" isn't a synonym for "writing". :p Homophonitis, perhaps? -- Kelson Vibber SpeedGate Communications

[ot] Re: HTML-tests good or bad?

2006-08-10 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
jdow wrote: From: "John Rudd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Aug 9, 2006, at 8:08 PM, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: jdow wrote: I've been noticing that this seems to be cropping up in an awful lot in the righting committed by younger folks. It contributes to the impression that even college graduates th