Re: {Spam?} spam with (rolex) watches gets trough

Thomas what extra rules above the standard SA ones have you got? Any from www.rulesemporium.com ? also have you got the URI rbl's turned on? This helps quite alot for this sort of spam. -- Martin Hepworth Snr Systems Administrator Solid State Logic Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300 Thomas Arend wrote:

Re: {Spam?} spam with (rolex) watches gets trough

On Wed, December 22, 2004 6:42 am, Martin Hepworth said: also have you got the URI rbl's turned on? This helps quite alot for this sort of spam. Indeed. That forwarded message ended up tagged as spam the URI checks are what caught it... even the AWL wasn't enough to save it. :) SpamAssassin

Re: {Spam?} spam with (rolex) watches gets trough

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Mittwoch, 22. Dezember 2004 12:42 schrieb Martin Hepworth: Thomas what extra rules above the standard SA ones have you got? Any from www.rulesemporium.com ? I have only the standard rules from SA 3.0.2 also have you got the URI rbl's turned

RE: {Spam?} spam with (rolex) watches gets trough

-Original Message- From: Thomas Arend [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 6:56 AM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: {Spam?} spam with (rolex) watches gets trough -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Mittwoch, 22. Dezember 2004 12:42

Re: {Spam?} spam with (rolex) watches gets trough

Chris Santerre wrote: Am Mittwoch, 22. Dezember 2004 12:42 schrieb Martin Hepworth: Thomas what extra rules above the standard SA ones have you got? Any from www.rulesemporium.com ? None of these have been tested yet. Use at your own risk. Do not operate while under heavy medication.

Re: {Spam?} spam with (rolex) watches gets trough

@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: {Spam?} spam with (rolex) watches gets trough -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Mittwoch, 22. Dezember 2004 12:42 schrieb Martin Hepworth: Thomas what extra rules above the standard SA ones have you got? Any from www.rulesemporium.com ? I have only